Hi Vincent, your patch for userguide is highly welcome :)
Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 21.07.2010 um 14:12 schrieb Vincent CHAVANIS: > Hi, > > we cannot predict the alias from the MSISDN > this was designed for ;) > > Also, This should IMO be mentionned into the source > of the driver, that we cannot send 2mt within the same sec > for the same dest/alias because, this is an known > limitation of the protocol. > > Vincent. > > > Le 21/07/2010 13:52, Nikos Balkanas a écrit : >> Hi Vincent, >> >> In this version, this patch will not affect other than EMI and CIMD2 DLRs. >> SMPP for example doesn't match against destination. However, EMI and CIMD2 >> do. Not >> to worry, though. Such a condition was anticipated. Mechanism was >> implemented to quickly switch from driver-specific to smsc configuration >> specific. Therefore >> with a minor change destination matching could be disabled for those smscs >> that use such encryption. >> >> However, that would mean that patch wouldn't apply for these cases, ie, DLRs >> received at the same time. A better way would be to calculate the encryption >> and >> implement it when used. Is there a way to predict it? How can I get more >> info about it? >> >> BR, >> Nikos >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent CHAVANIS" >> <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:45 PM >> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final) >> >> >> Hi nikos, >> >> 'alias' is an "crypted" MSISDN done by the operator-side >> to protect the customer (avoid spamming, and any abuses) >> This actually exists here in fr but i assume, >> this also exists on other countries >> >> I just want to be sure this will not >> break any existing installations. >> >> Vincent. >> >> >> Le 21/07/2010 12:16, Nikos Balkanas a Γ©crit : >>> @Vincent: With respect to destination alias, what do you mean? Looking for >>> alias in gwlib/cfg.def I cannot find anything relevant. >> >> > >
