Before, I could not test properly. Just got my office system & Internet connection back yesterday, since we've moved to another place. Testing via a GSM Internet link is not quite ideal :)...
So I've got to think of some kind of bench mark (ideas?) to compare the different implementations with. == Rene -----Original Message----- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 25 August, 2010 00:53 To: Rene Kluwen; [email protected] Subject: Re: Open smppbox queues -> priority queues Hi Rene, I am really confused here. I am still waiting for an answer. Are queues slowing down performance or not? If yes by what amount? Priority queues are the real hogger, especially the larger they get. I don't think that this is necessary, since they are prioritized in bb. I think since they are such a performance degradation, they shouldn't be implemented more than once. Lastly consider that if you put priority queues in smppbox, there will always be people thinking that they do not work the way they are supposed to ;-) BR, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: Rene Kluwen To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:00 PM Subject: Open smppbox queues -> priority queues Here again another patch, which uses priority queues. Looking for a way to come up with representative performance figures so we can decide which implementation is best. == Rene
