Not really, using different PDU's doesn't mean having to change Msg at all.
If there's different PDU's to handle submit, deliver, etc. it can be abstracted on the same Msg structure and it can be done with a special SMSC (or extending smsc_smpp as Alex suggested) and there's no need to touch anything else. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 19/09/2010, at 05:37, Nikos Balkanas wrote: >> it's a "sort" of SMPP with some PDU additions. The patch I have adds 3 >> parameters to the msg struct, which we could resolve maybe to use other known >> values if they semantically match. > > Do you mean PDU? Changing Msg is very troublesome. It needs changes to > smsbox, sqlbox, and smppbox in addition to bearerbox. > > BR, > Nikos > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]> > Cc: "'kannel_dev_mailinglist'" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 11:36 PM > Subject: Re: [RFC] adding CMPP (China Mobile's SMPP clone) SMSC client > sidemodule > > >> Rene Kluwen schrieb: >>> Exactly. Is this really different from plain old SMPP? >>> Maybe a configuration parameter can do the trick? >> >> it's a "sort" of SMPP with some PDU additions. The patch I have adds 3 >> parameters to the msg struct, which we could resolve maybe to use other known >> values if they semantically match. >> >> I'll have a view into it and post the patch for review by the group. >> >> Stipe >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Kφlner Landstrasse 419 >> 40589 Dόsseldorf, NRW, Germany >> >> tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) >> http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ >> >> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >
