Nope, check the patch, they implement their own PDU's, so it's either extending 
smsc_smpp to support those, or adding an extra smsc module (which is the 
cleanest approach imho). That, in addition to mapping those parameters into 
meta-data structures.

Using meta-data avoids having to modify the Msg structure, which is a good 
thing :)

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]



On 20/09/2010, at 19:02, Nikos Balkanas wrote:

> That means that the patch is unnecessary and current SMPP driver can handle 
> it with only a configuration change.
> 
> BR,
> Nikos
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Kluwen" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Stipe Tolj'" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "'kannel_dev_mailinglist'" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 6:25 PM
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] CMPP2 (China Mobile Peer to Peer) module
> 
> 
> I agree as well!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Stipe Tolj
> Sent: Monday, 20 September, 2010 15:14
> Cc: kannel_dev_mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] CMPP2 (China Mobile Peer to Peer) module
> 
> Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb:
>> --- gw/msg-decl.h (revision 4843)
>> +++ gw/msg-decl.h (working copy)
>> @@ -111,6 +111,11 @@
>>         INTEGER(resend_try)
>>         INTEGER(resend_time)
>>         OCTSTR(meta_data)
>> +        OCTSTR(service_id)
>> +        OCTSTR(fee_usertype)
>> +        OCTSTR(fee_terminal_id)
>> +        OCTSTR(fee_type)
>> +        OCTSTR(fee_code)
>>     })
>> 
>> What about using meta-data for that? Assuming a separate smsc module is
> used (unless all the new PDU's are implemented inside smsc_smpp?), using
> meta-data to pass the specific parameters could be an option.
> 
> yep, total agree here!
> 
> Stipe
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kφlner Landstrasse 419
> 40589 Dόsseldorf, NRW, Germany
> 
> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
> 
> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to