Hi,

the other possibility would be, to add meta-data to the msg in smsc module and 
by creation of DLR just duplicate
meta-data from original message. We use it this way, because it's easier then 
to check what the message failed and with which
meta-data...

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh


Am 30.09.2010 um 22:51 schrieb Rene Kluwen:

> I also have a client that added "reason code" for failed sms's.
> This patch would be a wonderful opportunity to add it to meta-data.
> 
> == Rene
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Victor Luchitz [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Saturday, 11 September, 2010 17:33
> To: Kannel Devel
> Cc: Rene Kluwen
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add meta_data parameter to bb_smscconn_send_failed
> 
> 2010/9/11 Rene Kluwen <[email protected]>:
>> So this is a patch of 500+ lines that basically does nothing? ;)
>> 
>> If this is a foundation: Why don't you send meta-data to bb_smscconn_sent()?
> 
> There's no practical need for that. Error codes are irrelevant to
> messages that were successfully transmitted :P
> 
>> 
>> == Rene
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
>> Of Victor Luchitz
>> Sent: Saturday, 11 September, 2010 15:14
>> To: Kannel Devel
>> Subject: [PATCH] Add meta_data parameter to bb_smscconn_send_failed
>> 
>> Hello.
>> 
>> The attached patch adds another parameter to bb_smscconn_send_failed, which 
>> is then copied to the sms.meta_data field of newly created DLR message. The 
>> main purpose of this patch is to allow transmission of protocol/network 
>> specific error codes in delivery reports' meta data.
>> At this moment, none of the smsc's use this functionality, the patch is 
>> basically a foundation for it.
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Victor Luchitz
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Victor Luchitz
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to