Hi Alex, The setup is not necessarily limited to a single server. Bb could be to another server than smsbox, even to different physical locations. Communication could be TCP over WAN. Network can cause a lot of failures and lost packages, beyond TCP retransmission.
Are not ACKs implemented in smsbox? I have not seen the sources, yet. BR, Nikos On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi James, > > why do you need retry between smsbox and bearerbox? bearerbox gives ack > immediately and if > not this is some strange bug that should be fixed. > > Thanks, > Alex > > Am 02.09.2011 um 11:32 schrieb JAmes: > > Hi Alex, > > So you need to restart smsbox for it to retry sending the message to > bearerbox? > > Regards, > J > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> smsbox does resend only by restart. >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> Am 02.09.2011 um 10:16 schrieb James: >> >> Thanks Nikos. >> >> Do you know the wait time before smsbox considers to resend the message? >> >> >> Regards, >> J >> >> On 02/09/2011, at 3:12 PM, Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am pretty sure they both wait for an ACK, according to architecture. >> Else they wouldn't work at all. Standard procedure for all smsbox clients is >> to resend the SMS if they don't receive an ACK from bb. >> >> BR, >> Nikos >> >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:19 AM, JAmes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am wondering, when smsbox / sqlbox is connected to bearerbox and sends >>> a MT sms, does smsbox / sqlbox wait for an ACK from BB? >>> >>> How does smsbox/sqlbox handle sms messages that BB doesn't ack? >>> >>> Regards, >>> J >>> >> >> >> > >
