As I stated before, I believe there is something wrong communication between sqlbox and smsbox (using the latest snapshot). This problem not occurs if we use the version right before meta-data introduced.
On May 7, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Rene Kluwen wrote: > What happens if you remove sqlbox out of the chain? > > == Rene > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Willy Mularto > Sent: Monday, 07 May, 2012 10:10 > To: users@kannel org; kannel_dev_mailinglist [email protected] > Subject: Re: test result on http smsc > > Hi again, > After tracing out I found that bearerbox and sqlbox has no problem receiving > the MO, I re test 10000 MO and I can see sqlbox received all, but smsbox > didn't receive all requests. I guess there is something between sqlbox and > smsbox in communicating the traffics. > > > On May 7, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Willy Mularto wrote: > > > Hi, > After a long time not playing with Kannel, today I just finished a simple > HTTP SMSC test set, sent 1000 requests (MO) but Kannel built in HTTP SMSC > (just downloaded the latests snapshot source and compile) only receive 487. > This inconsistence MO receiver bug still exist since meta_data introduced. > Any developer aware of this issue? My Kannel runs with > bearerbox-sqlbox-smsbox scenario. Thanks. > > > > Willy Mularto > F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725) > > > > > > > > > > > Willy Mularto > F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725) > > > > > > > > > Willy Mularto F300HD+MR18DE (NLC1725)
