Ok I guess not much call for this. I've just calculated client-side it in a similar way to how it's done by Kannel
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Doug Dixon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > I find it useful to have the "Message splits" in the sendsms response > body. However, this is not appended in the trunk version of Kannel, > unless immediate-sendsms-reply = true. This has obvious disadvantages (less > sanity checking). > > Would the maintainers be receptive to a patch that appends " Message > splits: %d" to the response body when: > > concatenation = true > immediate-sendsms-reply = false > > Or, if modifying the response body would be considered an unacceptable > compatibility breaker, would an HTTP response header be acceptable? > > Thanks > Doug > -- *Doug Dixon *|* CTO* | *Run The Red* | M +64 21 992 753 *[image: cid:3317968016_4849303]*
<<image001.png>>
