Thanks guys. I'm going over the spec from altlinux, but its slow going, never made an rpm before.
I'm having trouble sorting out exactly which files I should be bundling into the rpm. That spec file has: Source: gateway-%version.tar.bz2 Source1: config-%version.tar.bz2 Source2: bearerbox.init Source3: smsbox.init Source4: kannel.init Source5: kannel.logrotate Source6: kannel.monit None of those are part of the kannel dir structure / build system though so I assume there is another script being run somewhere that tars the necessary files and whatnot? ________________________________ From: Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> To: 'spameden' <[email protected]>; 'Brian McCavour' <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 8:40:57 AM Subject: RE: Build - RPM For sqlbox and opensmppbox "make rpm" should work. I think for Kannel itself it doesn't work (anymore). == Rene -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of spameden Sent: maandag 21 januari 2013 21:39 To: Brian McCavour Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Build - RPM there is an spec.rpm for altlinux, you can modify it for centos or any other RPM-based distro: https://github.com/blinohod/kannel-altlinux 2013/1/22 Brian McCavour <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > Bunch of build-deploy questions. > I want to re-create the rpm as it is when downloading the binary. Is > there a rpm spec file or anything around? > > Can I just run make, and tar/gz the gw/bearerbox, gw/smsbox, and > gw/wapbox binaries? Or do I need other files? > I'm not sure if maybe this is the wrong target, since when I run > bearerbox directly from gw dir, the -d flag doesn't seem to > work.Although I just realized maybe I need to separately start it after using this flag? > > Also when I do make install, it copies files kind of all over, .h > files and everything, which I found a bit odd, but I'm not too > experienced with either linux or C unfortunately (yet) > > > Thanks for any assistance, > Brian
