good catch! But there is a question: should we really accept such wrong PDUs or 
reject them?
IMHO rejecting those would be the correct behavior but I don't see in SMPP spec 
that case described.

Alexander Malysh   From: Stipe Tolj <st...@kannel.org>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 07:24 PM
Cc: kannel_dev_mailinglist <devel@kannel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Memory leak in smpp_pdu.c
Am 24.09.2016 13:55, schrieb Rene Kluwen:
> +1 from me.

yep, good catch Donald.

+1 for it.

If no objections, will commit.

Best Regards,
Stipe Tolj

Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

Kannel Foundation tolj.org system architecture
http://www.kannel.org/ http://www.tolj.org/

stolj at kannel.org st at tolj.org

Reply via email to