There goes your 493k glibc overhead ;-)
uClibc rocks.
Does it make sense to merge this back into the original flashrom utility?
I though about that but that will massively increase its size won't it? So OLPC would still need a seperate utility to include into buildrom. Perhaps I should refactor the code such that you can compile it into flashrom and also with olpcflash. Shouldn't increase the size much. We are only talking a couple of extra layer functions. -- Richard A. Smith _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
