Jim Gettys wrote: > On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 19:10 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> Ivan Krstić wrote: >>> Jim Gettys wrote: >>>>> What next? >>>> IPv6 >>> Yeah, IPv4 will be of no use to us in the BIOS; we want 6. Then we need >> I found no way to turn off IPv4 in the kernel config, IPv6 only becomes >> selectable if IPv4 is selected. We may want to look for patches removing >> that limitation. > > I don't think people in general make IPv6 implementations; TCP is TCP, > even if IP and the header fields are different. I don't think that > you'll find that...
Yes, but IPv4 routing code could be ripped out. That may save a few kb. There has to be a reason why the IPv6 code takes an additional ~60k (compressed). And for the code we add for IPv6 we should theoretically be able to remove the corresponding IPv4 code. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
