On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 12:32 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 20 October 2006 11:15, Andres Salomon wrote: > > What about a 4th option; FC6 + FC7 kernel? I consider stabilizing the > > toolchain and environment at this point a must. However, for driver > > development we've been tracking Linus's git tree, and the closer we are > > to that the easier it will be to port drivers. There are also > > additional features that we're hoping will make it into Linus's kernel; > > rather than backporting them to RHEL5's kernel, I'd rather just see the > > latest kernel used. > > This is possible, I think. Our build system allows for this but I don't know > if its ever been tested. The only problem is when something in the kernel > goes beyond what the FC6 userland can handle, or something in the package > itself is beyond what FC6 userland can handle. Still, its doable. >
Yes, the main thing I'd worry about would be another udev requirement bump. I can't imagine anything else requiring updated userland tools; module handling and initramfs stuff seems to be pretty stable atm. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
