Hi, so, can we have the sysprof kernel module for version 1.0.5 in future images?
Would make much easier my intended work on profiling. Thanks, Tomeu On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 10:23 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > if it was possible to have the sysprof kernel module for version 1.0.5 > instead of 1.0.3 (and the corresponding sysprof package on the devel > image) it would make it much easier for profiling sugar. > > >From version 1.0.5 sysprof comes with a text-mode collector that makes > it much more useful for us. I think it would be easier to update the > kernel module than to sugarize sysprof (or backport the 1.0.5 > sysprofile-text to use the 1.0.3 module). > > Also I don't understand what means "oprofile may come for free as a > result of sysprof", I think that oprofile needs it's own kernel module, > although both use the same kernel infrastructure. > > Don't know if it's possible/easy to use oprofile on the geode, but I > think that would be nice to have both profilers in order to compare the > results. > > Regards, > > Tomeu > > On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 03:14 +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > > Jim Gettys wrote: > > > > > > Blizzard: > > > - sysprof module has been added to kernel, is untested > > > > > > > We used sysprof to debug the perfomance issues with xbook and tamtam. It > > works pretty well. > > > > Marco > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
