On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 07:48 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> I will probably get piled-on for saying this, but in my experience,
> plain FAT filesystems work well for removable media. FAT was originally
> designed for removable media (floppy disks), which is not the case for
> ext2.
Also, using FAT is the right answer because it doesn't write uid/gid
information which is actually a useful feature for removable media as
you may have different uid's on different hosts.
David
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
