On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 01:33 +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 01:23 +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > > You've also changed the output. So you may partly broke batctl too (have
> > > to check that first).
> > There was no change in output.
> > MAC_FMT output is the same as %pM
> I meant the other patch :)

batctl is parsing dmesg or equivalent?  ouch.

If so, may I suggest you consider using something other than
a message logging parser for batctl?

I glanced at the source and don't see any such use.
It looks like it's only /sys, /proc and debugfs,
but I only spent a few seconds at it.

http://www.open-mesh.net/changeset/1682/trunk?old_path=%2F&format=zip

cheers, Joe

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to