On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 07:06:47PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello, In today linux-next I got a some compile warnings with the 
> staging/xgifb driver. This is the first of a 4 patchset that fix all the 
> issues.
> 
> The patches are:
> 
> [PATCH 1/4] staging: xgifb: Fix compile warning
> [PATCH 2/4] staging: xgifb: Add compilation conditionals
> [PATCH 3/4] staging: xgifb: Removes unused variable
> [PATCH 4/4] staging: xgifb: Init uninitialized variables and fix some style 
> issues
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/xgifb/XGI_main_26.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/xgifb/XGI_main_26.c 
> b/drivers/staging/xgifb/XGI_main_26.c
> index 7cd3e95..3c80191 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/xgifb/XGI_main_26.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/xgifb/XGI_main_26.c
> @@ -3418,7 +3418,7 @@ static int __devinit xgifb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>               XGIfb_registered = 1;
>  
>               printk(KERN_INFO "XGIfb: Installed XGIFB_GET_INFO ioctl 
> (%lx)\n",
> -                    XGIFB_GET_INFO);
> +                    (unsigned long)XGIFB_GET_INFO);

No, you should use %p instead.

Also, you don't spam the kernel log for assigning an ioctl function
pointer, that's just looney...

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to