On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:43:44AM +0100, Audun Hoem wrote: > From: Audun Hoem <[email protected]> > > I cleaned up the coding style. > > Signed-off-by: Audun Hoem <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c > b/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c > index ef7fbf8..9d439fa 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c > @@ -88,8 +88,11 @@ MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE("Frontier Designs Alphatrack > Control Surface"); > static int debug = ALPHATRACK_DEBUG; > > /* Use our own dbg macro */ > -#define dbg_info(dev, format, arg...) do \ > - { if (debug) dev_info(dev , format , ## arg); } while (0) > +#define dbg_info(dev, format, arg...) \ > +do { > + if (debug) > + dev_info(dev , format , ## arg); > +} while (0)
Oops, no, this doesn't work, and it breaks the build. Did you test your patch after you made it? (hint, you need to add a few more '\' characters...) Care to redo this and resend it? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
