On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:46:40PM +0100, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> 2011/2/27 Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>:
> > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:30:10PM +0100, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> >> >> -     lastframe = (fc & IEEE80211_FCTL_MOREFRAGS) == 0;
> >> >> +     lastframe = ieee80211_has_morefrags(h->frame_control);
> >> >
> >> > This is reversed.  It should be:
> >> >        if (ieee80211_has_morefrags(h->frame_control))
> >> >                lastframe = false;
> >> >        else
> >> >                lastframe = true;
> >>
> >> lastframe = !ieee80211_has_morefrags(h->frame_control);
> >>
> >
> > That way is a bit uglier.  The ! and the i sort of blend together and
> > make it harder to read.
> 
> Parenthesize it, then. Branching based on a boolean value, only to
> assign a different value to a boolean variable on each branch looks
> unprofessional.
> 
> Perhaps even add an equality, check? Like this:
> if (ieee80211_has_morefrags(h->frame_control) == true)...
> 

Yeah.  I obviously considered a several ways to write that and chose the
one I prefered...  *shrug*.

Write it the way Gábor says, because he cares a lot more about this 
bike shed than I do.  ;)

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to