Hi Javier, this change looks good to me.
Thanks, Roland. On 02/27/2011 09:54 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
struct ieee80211_ops.ampdu_action function pointer definition now includes a u8 buf_size parameter. Update wl_ops_ampdu_action handler function according to this new signature. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas<[email protected]> --- drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c | 6 ++++-- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c index 7645c6c..345243b 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c +++ b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wl_mac80211.c @@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int wl_ops_sta_remove(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, static int wl_ops_ampdu_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, enum ieee80211_ampdu_mlme_action action, - struct ieee80211_sta *sta, u16 tid, u16 *ssn); + struct ieee80211_sta *sta, u16 tid, u16 *ssn, + u8 buf_size); static void wl_ops_rfkill_poll(struct ieee80211_hw *hw); static int wl_ops_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb) @@ -609,7 +610,8 @@ static int wl_ops_ampdu_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, enum ieee80211_ampdu_mlme_action action, - struct ieee80211_sta *sta, u16 tid, u16 *ssn) + struct ieee80211_sta *sta, u16 tid, u16 *ssn, + u8 buf_size) { #if defined(BCMDBG) struct scb *scb = (struct scb *)sta->drv_priv;
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
