On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:50:23PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:48:12 +0300 > Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > These gotos were swapped. In the original code, the first would > > result in a NULL dereference and the second would result in a memory > > leak. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> > > Applied to my GMA500 tree. Need to sort out with GregKH how we handle > stuff in general though as it seems that staging may not work for this > driver due to the rate of change in the DRM tree.
I've already applied this to my tree. And yeah, I'm wondering if this makes sense to go through me, as you are going to be depending on drm changes. Perhaps you want to push it through there instead for the initial merge? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
