On Thursday 28 April 2011, Weil, Oren jer wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:53:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> I still think this should be a regular watchdog driver using the
> >> drivers/watchdog user interface.
> >
> >I agree, Oren, if you are going to insist on doing things this way, you had
> >better describe why you are ignoring the existing kernel interfaces
> >provided.
>
> we are not going to ignore the existing interfaces, it is one of our items
> in the TODO list.
> You can see the we move all of the Watchdog code to a single file so it
> would easy to us to take it later to other driver.
> Another Item on our TODO list is to expose Kernel function that equivalent
> to user interface so kernel clients
> can access FW features/clients.
Ok, fair enough. Please put important information like this into the
changelog next time.
Also, your TODO file seems to be missing form the submission.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
