On 05/18/2011 11:23 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
All uses of DHD_<TYPE> macros are for debugging only.
Change the multiple uses of DHD_<TYPE>((...)) to dhd_dbg(TYPE, ...)
for a more consistent style.
I generally like this approach, but in brcmsmac we've been switching to
wiphy_err() and related instead. Any strong argument for one over the
other?
- DHD_TRACE(("%s: Enter\n", __func__));
+ dhd_dbg(TRACE, "%s: Enter\n", __func__);
I'd propose moving __func__ into the macro definition itself, which
would help ensure consistency (and shorten all the debug lines a bit).
Also, perhaps rename to "brcm_dbg()", "bcm_dbg()" or something like that
and move it into include/bcmutils.h, so brcmsmac can use it as well.
- Henry
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
