This patch means we poll 20 times a second and test to see if we
have gone for 1000 polls without doing anything if so then we sleep.
Is there a way to get the same effect without the polling?  Like
maybe set a timer for 50 seconds in the future and every time we do
something then push the timer further into the future?

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 03:10:35PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> +config REALTEK_AUTOPM
> +     bool "Realtek Card Reader autosuspend support"
> +     depends on USB_STORAGE_REALTEK
> +     default y
>

This should probably depend on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME as well.

>  struct rts51x_chip {
> -     u16                     vendor_id;
> -     u16                     product_id;
> -     char                    max_lun;
> +     u16 vendor_id;
> +     u16 product_id;
> +     char max_lun;

There are about 50 lines of whitespace changes in this patch, but
those should be separated out and sent as a second patch.  I'm not
going to go through the patch and point out all 50 lines
individually.

>  /* flag definition */
> @@ -97,9 +139,28 @@ struct rts51x_chip {
>  #define RTS51X_GET_VID(chip)         ((chip)->vendor_id)
>  #define RTS51X_GET_PID(chip)         ((chip)->product_id)
>
> +#define VENDOR_ID(chip)                      ((chip)->status->vid)
> +#define PRODUCT_ID(chip)             ((chip)->status->pid)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_REALTEK_AUTOPM
> +#define FW_VERSION(chip)             ((chip)->status->fw_ver)
> +#else
>  #define FW_VERSION(chip)             ((chip)->status[0].fw_ver)

These definitions of FW_VERSION() produce the same thing, so we only
need one.  The original definition is better because chip->status
is an array, it's allocated in init_realtek_cr()

        size = (chip->max_lun + 1) * sizeof(struct rts51x_status);
        chip->status = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);

VENDOR_ID() and PRODUCT_ID() should be defined the same way.

> -#define wait_timeout_x(task_state, msecs)    \
> -do {                                         \
> -     set_current_state((task_state));        \
> -     schedule_timeout((msecs) * HZ / 1000);  \
> -} while (0)
> -
> -#define wait_timeout(msecs)          \
> -             wait_timeout_x(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, (msecs))
> -

Removing these unused macros is a nice cleanup, but it should go in
a separate patch.

> +static int fw5895_init(struct us_data *us)
> +{
> +     struct rts51x_chip *chip = (struct rts51x_chip *)(us->extra);
> +     int retval;
> +     u8 val;
> +
> +     US_DEBUGP("-- %s --\n", __func__);
> +
> +     if ((PRODUCT_ID(chip) != 0x0158) || (FW_VERSION(chip) != 0x5895)) {
> +             US_DEBUGP("Not the specified device, return immediately!\n");
> +             return STATUS_SUCCESS;

Should we really return SUCCESS here?  No one actually checks the
return value of this function so I suppose it doesn't matter either
way.

> +     }
> +
> +     retval = rts51x_read_mem(us, 0xFD6F, &val, 1);
> +     if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> +             US_DEBUGP("Read memory fail\n");
> +             RETURN(STATUS_FAIL);

There are two debug output lines in a row here.  One is enough.

> +void rts51x_polling(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +     struct rts51x_chip *chip = container_of(work, struct rts51x_chip,
> +                                             rts51x_delayed_work.work);
> +     struct us_data *us = chip->us;
> +
> +     /* lock the device pointers */
> +     mutex_lock(&(us->dev_mutex));
                    ^             ^
        These parens are not needed.  (My static checker sucks and
        it complains that the mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() don't
        match because one has parens and one doesn't).

> +
> +     US_DEBUGP("%s: <---\n", __func__);
> +
> +     switch (rts51x_get_stat(chip)) {
> +     case RTS51X_STAT_INIT:
> +             break;
> +     case RTS51X_STAT_RUN:
> +             chip->idle_counter = 0;
> +             break;
> +     case RTS51X_STAT_IDLE:{
> +             if (chip->idle_counter <
> +                             (ss_delay * 1000 / POLLING_INTERVAL)) {
> +                     US_DEBUGP("%s: idle_counter ++\n", __func__);
> +                     chip->idle_counter++;
> +                     break;
> +                     }
                        ^
        Should be back one indent level.

> +             }
                ^
        This pair of braces is not needed.

> +     case RTS51X_STAT_SS:{
> +             US_DEBUGP("%s: RTS51X_STAT_SS, intf->pm_usage_cnt:%d,"
> +                     "power.usage:%d\n", __func__,
> +                     atomic_read(&us->pusb_intf->pm_usage_cnt),
> +                     atomic_read(&us->pusb_intf->dev.power.usage_count));
> +
> +             if (atomic_read(&us->pusb_intf->pm_usage_cnt) > 0) {
> +                     US_DEBUGP("%s: Ready to enter SS state.\n",
> +                               __func__);
> +                     rts51x_set_stat(chip, RTS51X_STAT_SS);
> +                     /* ignore mass storage interface's children */
> +                     pm_suspend_ignore_children(&us->pusb_intf->dev, true);
> +                     usb_autopm_put_interface(us->pusb_intf);
> +                     US_DEBUGP("%s: RTS51X_STAT_SS 01,"
> +                             "intf->pm_usage_cnt:%d, power.usage:%d\n",
> +                             __func__,
> +                             atomic_read(&us->pusb_intf->pm_usage_cnt),
> +                             atomic_read(
> +                                     &us->pusb_intf->dev.power.usage_count));
> +             }
> +             break;
> +             }
                ^
        Same situation with these braces.


> +     default:
> +             US_DEBUGP("%s: Unknonwn state !!!\n", __func__);
> +             break;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (rts51x_get_stat(chip) != RTS51X_STAT_SS)
> +             queue_delayed_work(chip->rts51x_wq,
> +                                &(chip->rts51x_delayed_work),
                                    ^                         ^
        These parens are not needed.

> +                                POLLING_INTERVAL * HZ / 1000);
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        Use msecs_to_jiffies(POLLING_INTERVAL)

> +     /* unlock the device pointers */
> +     mutex_unlock(&us->dev_mutex);
> +
> +     US_DEBUGP("%s: --->\n", __func__);
> +}
> +
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to