Hello Julian,
Signed-off-by: Roland Vossen<[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel<[email protected]> --- diff --git a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/aiutils.c b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/aiutils.c index a25901e..5a5fc4b 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/aiutils.c +++ b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/aiutils.c @@ -1279,9 +1279,9 @@ ai_register_intr_callback(struct si_pub *sih, void *intrsoff_fn,sii = SI_INFO(sih); sii->intr_arg = intr_arg; - sii->intrsoff_fn = (si_intrsoff_t) intrsoff_fn; - sii->intrsrestore_fn = (si_intrsrestore_t) intrsrestore_fn; - sii->intrsenabled_fn = (si_intrsenabled_t) intrsenabled_fn; + sii->intrsoff_fn = (u32 (*)(void *)) intrsoff_fn; + sii->intrsrestore_fn = (void (*) (void *, u32)) intrsrestore_fn; + sii->intrsenabled_fn = (bool (*)(void *)) intrsenabled_fn; /* save current core id. when this function called, the current core * must be the core which provides driver functions(il, et, wl, etc.) */Are these casts necessary - as in could better types be chosen for these function pointers and the underlying functions themselves? I see the same issue in patches 6 - 10.
The first goal was to replace the typedefs, in a way that is obvious to the reviewer. The next step is to get rid of void* where possible (I agree with you that it is ugly).
Is it ok with you if we submit a separate patch train for that (since there are quite some void* to be replaced) ?
Thanks, Roland. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
