On 7/18/2011 12:42:15 PM, Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:29:58PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
@@ -1058,12 +1028,6 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
sdio_func_0.num = 0;
sdio_func_0.card = func->card;
gInstance->func[0] =&sdio_func_0;
- if (func->device == 0x4) { /* 4318 */
- gInstance->func[2] = NULL;
- sd_trace(("NIC found, calling brcmf_sdio_probe...\n"));
- ret = brcmf_sdio_probe(&sdmmc_dev);
- }
- atomic_set(&brcmf_mmc_suspend, false);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did you intend to delete that?
}
Hi Dan
No, i didn't. Thank you for pointing out this. I missed it when I
rebased my local branch. It didn't break any thing because
brcmf_mmc_suspend is a global variable. Is it ok to keep the patch like
this? I will prepare another patch to put it back and put the variable
in a structure instead of using a global.
Thanks,
Franky
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
