>> A 20 ms busy wait is rather nasty. Can't this be replaced with a >> sleeping wait (msleep)? > > Don't know yet - its on the fixme list to dig into - I think the answer > is some cases but not all.
IMO, it should be replaced with actually waiting for the vblank and not an arbitrary time. I think this is fine as long as we don't use it when waiting for a pipe to disable. And I guess we could sleep while waiting for vblank. Patrik _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
