From: Henry Ptasinski <[email protected]>

The original implementation iterated over the data in buf+1 through buf+size,
whereas it should have been over the data in buf through buf+size-1.

Tested on Mac G5 PPC and BCM63281.

Signed-off-by: Henry Ptasinski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Roland Vossen <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jonas Gorski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/srom.c |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/srom.c 
b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/srom.c
index 060f06f..7a17f59 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/srom.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/srom.c
@@ -880,13 +880,15 @@ int srom_var_init(struct si_pub *sih, void *curmap, char 
**vars, uint *count)
 
 static inline void ltoh16_buf(u16 *buf, unsigned int size)
 {
-       for (size /= 2; size; size--)
+       size /= 2;
+       while (size--)
                *(buf + size) = le16_to_cpu(*(buf + size));
 }
 
 static inline void htol16_buf(u16 *buf, unsigned int size)
 {
-       for (size /= 2; size; size--)
+       size /= 2;
+       while (size--)
                *(buf + size) = cpu_to_le16(*(buf + size));
 }
 
-- 
1.7.4.1


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to