> -----Original Message----- > From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 1:05 PM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: Greg KH; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Dmitry Torokhov > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_HID_WACOM) += hid-wacom.o > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_HID_WALTOP) += hid-waltop.o > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_HID_WIIMOTE) += hid-wiimote.o > > > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_HYPERV_MOUSE) += hv_mouse.o > > > > > > > > > > I'd prefer a bit to follow the current naming of the drivers in > > > > > drivers/hid directory ... all the device-specific (vendor-specific) > > > > > drivers currently are called hid-<vendor> or similar. > > > > > > > > > > We could talk about changing this naming scheme, but before we reach > any > > > > > conclusion on this, I'd prefer this to stay for all drivers if > > > > > possible. > > > > > > > > Do you want the driver module to conform to the naming scheme you > have? > > > > Greg, in the past has resisted changing driver names, but I have no > objection > > > > to conforming to the naming convention you have. > > > > > > I recommend following the proper naming scheme. As this driver is > > > auto-loaded when the virtual hardware is seen, the name really doesn't > > > matter at all. > > > > > > So, how about 'hid-hyperv' or 'hid-hv'? > > > > I will go with hid-hv if there are no objections. > > OK by me, thanks.
I am sorry I changed my mind and named it hid-hyperv. The patch I sent out has this name. I hope it is ok with you. Regards, K. Y _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
