Using kcalloc looks good to me.  Do you want to redo the patch in that way?

- xi

On Nov 23, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> I think the reason why I didn't do that in my original patch is that
> kcalloc() has a memset(..., 0, ...) in it so it's a slow down.  But
> this isn't performance critical code so that would work.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to