On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:19:19AM +0000, Martyn Welch wrote:
> On 30/11/11 11:00, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:25:39AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 02:23:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >>> What I mean is who else can we ask to review this?  Probably it would
> >>> be the PCI people.
> >>>
> >>> PCI SUBSYSTEM
> >>> M:      Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
> >>> L:      [email protected]
> >>>
> >>> That's the only obvious one that I know of, but there might be other
> >>> people interested as well if we can think of them.  Andrew Morton was
> >>> complaining about stuff coming out of staging without him being aware
> >>> but he reads lkml so I think CC'ing lkml is enough for him.
> >>
> >> Yes, when we submit the patches to move things, copying lkml will be a
> >> good idea.
> >>
> >> After the 3.2 merge window closes, next week, I'll take a look at the
> >> code and let you know what I think needs to be done to get this out of
> >> staging.
> > 
> > Ok, I didn't get past vme.h, please remove all the typedefs and the
> > foolish _t stuff, and we can then retry this :)
> > 
> 
> I assume that the correct thing to do (given that all those typedefs currently
> map to u32s) is to just use u32s?

Yes.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to