On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 11:12 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:38:34PM +0530, Pradheep Shrinivasan wrote:
> >>> > > -#define PMEM_IOCTL_MAGIC 'p'
> >> > > +#define PMEM_IOCTL_MAGIC ('p')
> >> > You don't need parenthesis here. Did checkpatch really complain
> >> > about this?
> >> Yes the check patch does complain about the parenthesis.
> > That seems like a bug in checkpatch.pl. It's hard to imagine less
> > complex macro than: #define PMEM_IOCTL_MAGIC 'p'
> I can think of no way in which an unprotected character is different
> to an unprotected integer constant. So ...
> Does the version here work better for you:
> http://people.canonical.com/~apw/checkpatch/checkpatch-next.pl
diff here is:
@@ -2838,7 +2849,8 @@
if ($dstat ne '' &&
$dstat !~ /^(?:$Ident|-?$Constant),$/ &&
# 10, // foo(),
$dstat !~ /^(?:$Ident|-?$Constant);$/ &&
# foo();
- $dstat !~ /^(?:$Ident|-?$Constant)$/ &&
# 10 // foo()
+ $dstat !~ /^[!~-]?(?:$Ident|$Constant)$/ &&
# 10 // foo() // !foo // ~foo // -foo
+ $dstat !~ /^'X'$/ &&
# character constants
$dstat !~ /$exceptions/ &&
$dstat !~ /^\.$Ident\s*=/ &&
# .foo =
$dstat !~ /^do\s*$Constant\s*while\s*$Constant;?$/
&& # do {...} while (...); // do {...} while (...)
I think the character change test is fine but
the !~- addition/change is suspect.
!~- are precedence level 3 operators
and can be impacted by things like ++
and function calls.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
