On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:45:55PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> We always hold the waitqueue lock when modifying the flags field. So it is 
> safe
> to use the non-atomic bitops here instead of the atomic versions.
> 
> The lock has to be held, because we need to clear the busy flag and flush the
> event fifo in one atomic operation when closing the event file descriptor.
> 

Is the performance improvement worth it?

regards,
dan carpenter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to