On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 06:33:56PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 20:58 -0400, Andrew Miller wrote:
> > Fix long line coding style issue
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Miller <[email protected]>
Thanks for the review

I think I starting to get the idea of what I need to be looking for.

> 
> Hi Andrew.
> 
> Please strive for clarity instead of just fixing
> random 80 char warnings.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8187se/r8180_core.c 
> > b/drivers/staging/rtl8187se/r8180_core.c
> []
> > @@ -1607,17 +1609,20 @@ void rtl8180_rx(struct net_device *dev)
> >             /* printk("==========================>rx : RXAGC is 
> > %d,signalstrength is %d\n",RXAGC,stats.signalstrength); */
> >             stats.rssi = priv->wstats.qual.qual = priv->SignalQuality;
> >             stats.noise = priv->wstats.qual.noise = 100 - 
> > priv->wstats.qual.qual;
> > -           bHwError = (((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x00000fff)) == 4080) | 
> > (((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x04000000)) != 0)
> > -                   | (((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x08000000)) != 0) | 
> > (((~(*(priv->rxringtail))) & (0x10000000)) != 0) | 
> > (((~(*(priv->rxringtail))) & (0x20000000)) != 0);
> > +           bHwError = (((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x00000fff)) == 4080) |
> > +                      (((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x04000000)) != 0) |
> > +                      (((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x08000000)) != 0) |
> > +                      (((~(*(priv->rxringtail))) & (0x10000000)) != 0) |
> > +                      (((~(*(priv->rxringtail))) & (0x20000000)) != 0);
> 
> Likely these | uses should be ||

I'm not really sure what you mean, do you mean I should change '|' to '||"?
like this
                
           bHwError = (((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x00000fff)) == 4080) ||
                      (((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x04000000)) != 0) ||
                      (((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x08000000)) != 0) ||
                      (((~(*(priv->rxringtail))) & (0x10000000)) != 0) ||
                      (((~(*(priv->rxringtail))) & (0x20000000)) != 0);

> 
> >             bCRC = ((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x00002000)) >> 13;
> >             bICV = ((*(priv->rxringtail)) & (0x00001000)) >> 12;
> >             hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr_4addr *)priv->rxbuffer->buf;
> >                 fc = le16_to_cpu(hdr->frame_ctl);
> >             type = WLAN_FC_GET_TYPE(fc);
> >  
> > -                   if ((IEEE80211_FTYPE_CTL != type) &&
> > -                           
> > (eqMacAddr(priv->ieee80211->current_network.bssid, (fc & 
> > IEEE80211_FCTL_TODS) ? hdr->addr1 : (fc & IEEE80211_FCTL_FROMDS) ? 
> > hdr->addr2 : hdr->addr3))
> > -                            && (!bHwError) && (!bCRC) && (!bICV)) {
> > +                   if ((IEEE80211_FTYPE_CTL != type) && 
> > (eqMacAddr(priv->ieee80211->current_network.bssid,
> > +                       (fc & IEEE80211_FCTL_TODS) ? hdr->addr1 : (fc & 
> > IEEE80211_FCTL_FROMDS) ? hdr->addr2 : hdr->addr3))
> > +                       && (!bHwError) && (!bCRC) && (!bICV)) {
> 
> This is difficult to read and could be better written
> removing unnecessary parentheses and making the egMacAddr
> clearer as a function/macro call:
> 
>                       if (IEEE80211_FTYPE_CTL != type &&
>                           eqMacAddr(priv->ieee80211->current_network.bssid,
>                                     fc & IEEE80211_FCTL_TODS ? hdr->addr1 :
>                                     fc & IEEE80211_FCTL_FROMDS ? hdr->addr2 :
>                                     hdr->addr3) &&
>                           !bHwError &&
>                           !bCRC &&
>                           !bICV)
> 
> It might be better to reshuffle the test order too:
>                       if (IEEE80211_FTYPE_CTL != type &&
>                          !bHwError && bCRC && !bICV &&
>                           eqMacAddr(priv->ieee80211->current_network.bssid,
>                                     fc & IEEE80211_FCTL_TODS ? hdr->addr1 :
>                                     fc & IEEE80211_FCTL_FROMDS ? hdr->addr2 :
>                                     hdr->addr3))
> 
> etc...

That does look much cleaner, It never occurred to me that I can do that.

Thanks for your help, I'm really trying to do better, I will have this fix up 
tomorrow for another review.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to