On 4/17/2012 7:45 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
ISL29018 is from Intersil Corporation and the vendor prefix
for this part should be "isl", at least not "invn" for OF
compatibility.
Fine with me.  Not really my domain other than where it sits though!
Send on to Greg when you get acks from device tree side.

Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan<[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c |    2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c 
b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c
index 38ec52b..ee220ae 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29018.c
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id isl29018_id[] = {
  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, isl29018_id);

  static const struct of_device_id isl29018_of_match[] = {
-       { .compatible = "invn,isl29018", },
+       { .compatible = "isl,isl29018", },
        { },
  };
  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, isl29018_of_match);

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to