This patch fixes the following warning reported
by checkpatch.pl: "WARNING: __packed is preferred
over __attribute__((packed))".

Signed-off-by: Kevin McKinney <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/staging/bcm/Adapter.h |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Adapter.h b/drivers/staging/bcm/Adapter.h
index 643a0f5..3413e78 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/bcm/Adapter.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/Adapter.h
@@ -12,26 +12,26 @@ struct _LEADER {
        USHORT PLength;
        UCHAR  Status;
        UCHAR  Unused[3];
-} __attribute__((packed));
+} __packed;
 typedef struct _LEADER LEADER, *PLEADER;
 
 struct _PACKETTOSEND {
        LEADER Leader;
        UCHAR  ucPayload;
-} __attribute__((packed));
+} __packed;
 typedef struct _PACKETTOSEND PACKETTOSEND, *PPACKETTOSEND;
 
 struct _CONTROL_PACKET {
        PVOID ControlBuff;
        UINT  ControlBuffLen;
        struct _CONTROL_PACKET *next;
-} __attribute__((packed));
+} __packed;
 typedef struct _CONTROL_PACKET CONTROL_PACKET, *PCONTROL_PACKET;
 
 struct link_request {
        LEADER Leader;
        UCHAR  szData[4];
-} __attribute__((packed));
+} __packed;
 typedef struct link_request LINK_REQUEST, *PLINK_REQUEST;
 
 /* classification extension is added */
@@ -518,14 +518,14 @@ struct _ETH_HEADER_STRUC {
        UCHAR       au8DestinationAddress[6];
        UCHAR       au8SourceAddress[6];
        USHORT      u16Etype;
-} __attribute__((packed));
+} __packed;
 typedef struct _ETH_HEADER_STRUC ETH_HEADER_STRUC, *PETH_HEADER_STRUC;
 
 typedef struct FirmwareInfo {
        void __user *pvMappedFirmwareAddress;
        ULONG           u32FirmwareLength;
        ULONG           u32StartingAddress;
-} __attribute__((packed)) FIRMWARE_INFO, *PFIRMWARE_INFO;
+} __packed FIRMWARE_INFO, *PFIRMWARE_INFO;
 
 /* holds the value of net_device structure.. */
 extern struct net_device *gblpnetdev;
-- 
1.7.9.5

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to