On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:25:00AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote: > > As there is no pr_* function used here, pr_fmt is not needed. > > > > Nah. What about if we decide to add some? Also there are actually > a couple pr_err() calls in there already.
Oops. Sorry my tree is old. We removed the two calls to pr_err(). regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
