On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 10:25 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> > As there is no pr_* function used here, pr_fmt is not needed.
> > 
> 
> Nah.  What about if we decide to add some?  Also there are actually
> a couple pr_err() calls in there already.

Oops, you are right! Forget this patch!

Thanks,

Sam

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to