On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 2:16 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 2012-06-26 10:09, Ian Abbott wrote:
>> On 2012-06-26 01:17, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>> @@ -129,7 +124,22 @@ static int das16cs_ai_rinsn(struct comedi_device *dev,
>>>     outw(devpriv->status1, dev->iobase + 4);
>>>
>>>     devpriv->status2 &= ~0xff00;
>>> -   devpriv->status2 |= range_bits[range];
>>> +   switch (range) {
>>> +   case 0:
>>> +           devpriv->status2 |= 0x800;
>>> +           break;
>>> +   case 1:
>>> +           devpriv->status2 |= 0x000;
>>> +           break;
>>> +   case 2:
>>> +           devpriv->status2 |= 0x100;
>>> +           break;
>>> +   case 3:
>>> +           devpriv->status2 |= 0x200;
>>> +           break;
>>> +   default:
>>> +           return -EINVAL;
>>> +   }
>>
>> Is that really an improvement?  The 'range' variable value will be in
>> range anyway (the comedi core checks beforehand in
>> comedi_check_chanlist()), and looking up the constant to OR with
>> devpriv->status2 is probably less object code (and certainly less source
>> code).
>
> I meant looking up the constant in the static array of course.  It 
> doesn't really matter if you want to do it this way though, and the 
> `static int range_bits[]` you removed should have been `static const int 
> range_bits[]` anyway.

This, and your other comment about the PCMCIA support, have
been addressed.

Thanks for the review!

Regards,
Hartley

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to