On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:54:28 +0545
> Devendra Naga <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> TCB has kcalloc' ed so no need to call memset again on it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Devendra Naga <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c |    2 --
>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c 
>> b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c
>> index 227fca9..5010894 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c
>> @@ -2131,8 +2131,6 @@ static void et131x_init_send(struct et131x_adapter 
>> *adapter)
>>
>>       tx_ring->tcb_qhead = tcb;
>>
>> -     memset(tcb, 0, sizeof(struct tcb) * NUM_TCB);
>
> Its such a rarely used path with several entry points that it's probably
> safer kept as is.
>
Hi Alan Sir,

 Glad to see your reply, I really didn't saw the whole code paths, was
seeing the ring allocations, sorry for the noise.
> Alan

Thanks,
Devendra.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to