On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 05:15:17AM -0700, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 01:55:56PM -0400, Kevin McKinney wrote:
> > This patch replaces an invalid device id of 0x132
> > with the correct device id of 0x172 as reported
> > by Rinat Camalov <[email protected]>.
> > 
> 
> It could be that both IDs are valid.  It wouldn't hurt to leave the
> old one in until we were certain.
> 
> -#define BCM_USB_PRODUCT_ID_226       0x0132
> +#define BCM_USB_PRODUCT_ID_226       0x0132  /* not sure if this is valid */
> +#define BCM_USB_PRODUCT_ID_ZTE_226   0x0172
> 
> Then add it to the InterfaceUsbtable[] array at the top of
> drivers/staging/bcm/InterfaceInit.c
> 
> Also I would be interested to know if Rinat was actually able to get
> the device to work or was it only loading.

I agree, let's get some confirmation here first.

I've dropped this patch for now.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to