On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 05:56:09AM -0700, Daniel Cotey wrote: > Resending with fixes and unapplied security patchs > > Dan Carpenter (2): > Staging: silicom: add some range checks to proc functions > Staging: silicom: use kstrtoint_from_user() > > Daniel Cotey (23): > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bp_mod.h: checkpatch tab and space cleanup > Staging: silicom: bypass.h: checkpatch whitespace > Staging: silicom: bypass.h: checkpatch whitespace
Ok, the goal is to not have the same subject line for different patches. Surely you are doing different things in these patches? I assumed you were modifying different files, but didn't check. Isn't there something unique you can say here? greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
