On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:16:54PM +0100, Ceri James wrote:
> >>@@ -985,11 +992,13 @@ cntrlEnd:
> >> if (uiData) {
> >> /* Allow All Packets */
> >>- BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_OTHERS, OSAL_DBG,
> >>DBG_LVL_ALL, "IOCTL_BCM_SWITCH_TRANSFER_MODE: ETH_PACKET_TUNNELING_MODE\n");
> >>- Adapter->TransferMode =
> >>ETH_PACKET_TUNNELING_MODE;
> >>+ BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_OTHERS, OSAL_DBG,
> >>DBG_LVL_ALL,
> >>+ "IOCTL_BCM_SWITCH_TRANSFER_MODE:
> >>ETH_PACKET_TUNNELING_MODE\n");
> >>+ Adapter->TransferMode =
> >>ETH_PACKET_TUNNELING_MODE;
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >This is indented too far now. It's better to wait over night and
> >re-review your changes the next morning before resending.
> This is not a hasty mistake, it is not knowing the correct/expected
> indentation rules :)
> So the correct indentation is as below?
> >+ BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_OTHERS, OSAL_DBG,
> >DBG_LVL_ALL,
> >+ "IOCTL_BCM_SWITCH_TRANSFER_MODE:
> >ETH_PACKET_TUNNELING_MODE\n");
> >+ Adapter->TransferMode =
> >ETH_PACKET_TUNNELING_MODE;
No. It's a new statement. It should be:
BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_OTHERS, OSAL_DBG,
DBG_LVL_ALL,
"IOCTL_BCM_SWITCH_TRANSFER_MODE:
ETH_PACKET_TUNNELING_MODE\n");
Adapter->TransferMode = ETH_PACKET_TUNNELING_MODE;
> >>@@ -1397,7 +1423,9 @@ cntrlEnd:
> >> }
> >> do_gettimeofday(&tv1);
> >>- BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_OTHERS, OSAL_DBG,
> >>DBG_LVL_ALL, " timetaken by Write/read :%ld msec\n", (tv1.tv_sec -
> >>tv0.tv_sec)*1000 + (tv1.tv_usec - tv0.tv_usec)/1000);
> >>+ BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_OTHERS, OSAL_DBG, DBG_LVL_ALL,
> >>+ " timetaken by Write/read :%ld msec\n",
> >>+ (tv1.tv_sec - tv0.tv_sec)*1000 + (tv1.tv_usec -
> >>tv0.tv_usec)/1000);
> >We would normally put spaces around the multiply and divide as well.
> >
> > (tv1.tv_sec - tv0.tv_sec) * 1000 + (tv1.tv_usec
> > - tv0.tv_usec) / 1000);
> Fair enough, I may have missed this in the checkpatch output. I will
> double check.
Checkpatch.pl doesn't warn about these. Normally I would ignore
them if you didn't introduce it, but since I was already commenting
on stuff I figured I may as well mention it.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
