On 12/12/2012 11:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > Related, are you now comfortable with abandoning "zcache1" and > moving "zcache2" (now in drivers/staging/ramster in 3.7) to become > the one-and-only in-tree drivers/staging/zcache (with ramster > as a subdirectory and build option)? It would be nice to get > rid of that artificial and confusing distinction as soon as possible, > especially if, due to zswap, you have no plans to continue to > maintain/enhance/promote zcache1 anymore.
Yes, that's fine by me. I guess that didn't get said explicitly in the last discussion so sorry for any confusion. Seth _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
