On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 2:04 PM <devel-requ...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io>
wrote:

> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:01:33 +0000
> From: HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio...@nec.com>
> Subject: [Crash-utility] Re: [PATCH v4 ] Adding the zram decompression
>         algorithm "lzo-rle" to support kernel versions >= 5.1
> To: Yulong TANG 汤玉龙 <yulong.t...@nio.com>,
>         "devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io"
>         <devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io>
> Message-ID: <ce7328ee-aab4-4b72-85d5-77e5ef3af...@nec.com>
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>         boundary="_002_ce7328eeaab44b7285d577e5ef3aff9aneccom_"
>
>
Hi,  Yulong

I have one question about the following function:

+static uint16_t get_unaligned_le16(const void *p) {
+    uint16_t value;
+    memcpy(&value, p, sizeof(uint16_t));
+    return value;
+}

Is this for handling the data under a little-endian machine? It might have
a different result when calling the above function on a
big-endian/little-endian machine, is that expected behavior? Just confirm
with you.

Thanks
Lianbo
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki

Reply via email to