Hi lijiang and tao,



Thanks, the case where IKCONFIG does not exist was indeed not considered before.




In file arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h

We can see the "struct ptrauth_keys_kernel" have already been embeded into 
arm's thread structure.

 

136  struct thread_struct {

137  struct cpu_contextcpu_context;/* cpu context */

...

159  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH

160  struct ptrauth_keys_userkeys_user;

161  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL

162  struct ptrauth_keys_kernelkeys_kernel;

163  #endif

...

169  };




So your suggestion [1]  is a very good idead to dealing with the case that 
IKCONFIG is not available.




--->

[1] check if the struct ptrauth_keys_kernel exists, eg:


STRUCT_SIZE_INIT(ptrauth_keys_kernel, "ptrauth_keys_kernel");


if (VALID_SIZE(ptrauth_keys_kernel) > 0) {

                       if (machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL){

                               machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK =

                                       GENMASK_UL(63, 
machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);

}

---<




BTW,  most of the mobile phone already have IKCONFIG setting as using the 
google's gki kernel.

So we may check IKconfig first , if the checking fail then we try to check if 
the struct ptrauth_keys_kernel exists should be a much compatible methods?







What's more, the CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL does depend on 
CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH, just checking the CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL should 
enough.




Origin KCONFIG:

1616 config ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL

1617 bool "Use pointer authentication for kernel"

1618 default y

1619 depends on ARM64_PTR_AUTH




I will change the patch according to our discussion and do the local test first.

If any other suggestion, please feel free to let me know.


At 2024-07-16 19:20:33, "Tao Liu" <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi Lijiang,
>
>Thanks for the info.
>
>On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 9:51 PM lijiang <liji...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for the update.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:59 AM cb126yx <cb12...@126.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, as the origin patch has aleardy been added to patch log,
>>>
>>> so the below comment in arm64.c is Inappropriate and inconsistent:
>>>
>>>              * gki related commit url:
>>>
>>>              * 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230412160134.306148-4-mark.rutl...@arm.com/
>>>
>>>  so delete these url link  comment in V4 version.
>>>
>>>
>>> patch v4 here:
>>>
>>> ===>
>>>
>>>
>>> From ab61e60987e4a835e41e4c19822174045888b84e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>
>>> From: bevis_chen <bevis_c...@asus.com>
>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:05:44 +0800
>>>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix bt command show wrong stacktrace on ramdump 
>>> source
>>>
>>>
>>> If we use crash to parse ramdump(Qcom phone device) rathen than vmcore.
>>>
>>> Start command should be like: crash vmlinux --kaslr=xxx 
>>> DDRCS0_0.BIN@0x0000000080000000,... --machdep vabits_actual=39
>>>
>>> Then We will see bt command show misleading backtrace information below:
>>>
>>>
>>> crash> bt 16930
>>>
>>> PID: 16930    TASK: ffffff89b3eada00  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "Firebase Backgr"
>>>
>>>  #0 [ffffffc034c437f0] __switch_to at ffffffe0036832d4
>>>
>>>  #1 [ffffffc034c43850] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 6be732e004cf05a0
>>>
>>>    #2 [ffffffc034c438b0] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 86c54c6004ceff80
>>>
>>>  #3 [ffffffc034c43950] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 55d6f96003a7b120
>>>
>>>  #4 [ffffffc034c439f0] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 9ccec46003a80a64
>>>
>>>  #5 [ffffffc034c43ac0] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 8cf41e6003a945c4
>>>
>>>  #6 [ffffffc034c43b10] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at a8f181e00372c818
>>>
>>>  #7 [ffffffc034c43b40] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 6dedde600372c0d0
>>>
>>>  #8 [ffffffc034c43b90] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 62cc07e00373d0ac
>>>
>>>  #9 [ffffffc034c43c00] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 72fb1de00373bedc
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>      PC: 00000073f5294840   LR: 00000070d8f39ba4   SP: 00000070d4afd5d0
>>>
>>>     X29: 00000070d4afd600  X28: b4000071efcda7f0  X27: 00000070d4afe000
>>>
>>>     X26: 0000000000000000  X25: 00000070d9616000  X24: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     X23: 0000000000000000  X22: 0000000000000000  X21: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     X20: b40000728fd27520  X19: b40000728fd27550  X18: 000000702daba000
>>>
>>>     X17: 00000073f5294820  X16: 00000070d940f9d8  X15: 00000000000000bf
>>>
>>>     X14: 0000000000000000  X13: 00000070d8ad2fac  X12: b40000718fce5040
>>>
>>>     X11: 0000000000000000  X10: 0000000000000070   X9: 0000000000000001
>>>
>>>      X8: 0000000000000062   X7: 0000000000000020   X6: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>      X5: 0000000000000000   X4: 0000000000000000   X3: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>      X2: 0000000000000002   X1: 0000000000000080   X0: b40000728fd27550
>>>
>>>     ORIG_X0: b40000728fd27550  SYSCALLNO: ffffffff  PSTATE: 40001000
>>>
>>>
>>> By checking the raw data below, will see the lr (fp+8) data show the 
>>> pointer which already been replaced by PAC prefix.
>>>
>>>
>>> crash> bt -f
>>>
>>> PID: 16930    TASK: ffffff89b3eada00  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "Firebase Backgr"
>>>
>>>  #0 [ffffffc034c437f0] __switch_to at ffffffe0036832d4
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c437f0: ffffffc034c43850 6be732e004cf05a4
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43800: ffffffe006186108 a0ed07e004cf09c4
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43810: ffffff8a1a340000 ffffff8a8d343c00
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43820: ffffff89b3eada00 ffffff8b780db540
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43830: ffffff89b3eada00 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43840: 0000000000000004 712b828118484a00
>>>
>>>  #1 [ffffffc034c43850] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 6be732e004cf05a0
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43850: ffffffc034c438b0 86c54c6004ceff84
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43860: 000000708070f000 ffffffc034c43938
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43870: ffffff88bd822878 ffffff89b3eada00
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> So we check the CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH and CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL to 
>>> double check if pac mechanism been enabled on this ramdump.
>>>
>>> Then we use vabits to figure it out.
>>>
>>> Fix then show the right backtrace below:
>>>
>>> crash> bt 16930
>>>
>>> PID: 16930    TASK: ffffff89b3eada00  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "Firebase Backgr"
>>>
>>>  #0 [ffffffc034c437f0] __switch_to at ffffffe0036832d4
>>>
>>>  #1 [ffffffc034c43850] __schedule at ffffffe004cf05a0
>>>
>>>  #2 [ffffffc034c438b0] preempt_schedule_common at ffffffe004ceff80
>>>
>>>  #3 [ffffffc034c43950] unmap_page_range at ffffffe003a7b120
>>>
>>>  #4 [ffffffc034c439f0] unmap_vmas at ffffffe003a80a64
>>>
>>>  #5 [ffffffc034c43ac0] exit_mmap at ffffffe003a945c4
>>>
>>>  #6 [ffffffc034c43b10] __mmput at ffffffe00372c818
>>>
>>>  #7 [ffffffc034c43b40] mmput at ffffffe00372c0d0
>>>
>>>  #8 [ffffffc034c43b90] exit_mm at ffffffe00373d0ac
>>>
>>>  #9 [ffffffc034c43c00] do_exit at ffffffe00373bedc
>>>
>>>      PC: 00000073f5294840   LR: 00000070d8f39ba4   SP: 00000070d4afd5d0
>>>
>>>     X29: 00000070d4afd600  X28: b4000071efcda7f0  X27: 00000070d4afe000
>>>
>>>     X26: 0000000000000000  X25: 00000070d9616000  X24: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     X23: 0000000000000000  X22: 0000000000000000  X21: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     X20: b40000728fd27520  X19: b40000728fd27550  X18: 000000702daba000
>>>
>>>     X17: 00000073f5294820  X16: 00000070d940f9d8  X15: 00000000000000bf
>>>
>>>     X14: 0000000000000000  X13: 00000070d8ad2fac  X12: b40000718fce5040
>>>
>>>     X11: 0000000000000000  X10: 0000000000000070   X9: 0000000000000001
>>>
>>>      X8: 0000000000000062   X7: 0000000000000020   X6: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>      X5: 0000000000000000   X4: 0000000000000000   X3: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>      X2: 0000000000000002   X1: 0000000000000080   X0: b40000728fd27550
>>>
>>>     ORIG_X0: b40000728fd27550  SYSCALLNO: ffffffff  PSTATE: 40001000
>>>
>>>
>>> Let's use GENMASK to replace the pac pointer to fix it.
>>>
>>> gki related commit as below:
>>>
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> Author: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kach...@arm.com>
>>>
>>> Date:   Fri Mar 13 14:34:58 2020 +0530
>>>
>>>
>>>     arm64: mask PAC bits of __builtin_return_address
>>>
>>>
>>>     Functions like vmap() record how much memory has been allocated by their
>>>
>>>     callers, and callers are identified using __builtin_return_address(). 
>>> Once
>>>
>>>     the kernel is using pointer-auth the return address will be signed. This
>>>
>>>     means it will not match any kernel symbol, and will vary between threads
>>>
>>>     even for the same caller.
>>>
>>>
>>>     The output of /proc/vmallocinfo in this case may look like,
>>>
>>>     0x(____ptrval____)-0x(____ptrval____)   20480 0x86e28000100e7c60 
>>> pages=4 vmalloc N0=4
>>>
>>>     0x(____ptrval____)-0x(____ptrval____)   20480 0x86e28000100e7c60 
>>> pages=4 vmalloc N0=4
>>>
>>>     0x(____ptrval____)-0x(____ptrval____)   20480 0xc5c78000100e7c60 
>>> pages=4 vmalloc N0=4
>>>
>>>
>>>     The above three 64bit values should be the same symbol name and not
>>>
>>>     different LR values.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Use the pre-processor to add logic to clear the PAC to
>>>
>>>     __builtin_return_address() callers. This patch adds a new file
>>>
>>>     asm/compiler.h and is transitively included via 
>>> include/compiler_types.h on
>>>
>>>     the compiler command line so it is guaranteed to be loaded and the 
>>> users of
>>>
>>>     this macro will not find a wrong version.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Helper macros ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask/ptrauth_clear_pac are created for
>>>
>>>     this purpose and added in this file. Existing macro 
>>> ptrauth_user_pac_mask
>>>
>>>     moved from asm/pointer_auth.h.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kach...@arm.com>
>>>
>>>     Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.mo...@arm.com>
>>>
>>>     Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>>
>>> index 87e2cbb76930..115ceea0293e 100644
>>>
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>>
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>>
>>> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ config ARM64
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE if SLUB
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE
>>>
>>> +       select HAVE_ARCH_COMPILER_H
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h 
>>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
>>>
>>> new file mode 100644
>>>
>>> index 000000000000..eece20d2c55f
>>>
>>> --- /dev/null
>>>
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
>>>
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>>>
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>>
>>> +#ifndef __ASM_COMPILER_H
>>>
>>> +#define __ASM_COMPILER_H
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH)
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +/*
>>>
>>> + * The EL0/EL1 pointer bits used by a pointer authentication code.
>>>
>>> + * This is dependent on TBI0/TBI1 being enabled, or bits 63:56 would also 
>>> apply.
>>>
>>> + */
>>>
>>> +#define ptrauth_user_pac_mask()                GENMASK_ULL(54, 
>>> vabits_actual)
>>>
>>> +#define ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask()      GENMASK_ULL(63, vabits_actual)
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +/* Valid for EL0 TTBR0 and EL1 TTBR1 instruction pointers */
>>>
>>> +#define ptrauth_clear_pac(ptr)                                         \
>>>
>>> +       ((ptr & BIT_ULL(55)) ? (ptr | ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask()) :      \
>>>
>>> +                              (ptr & ~ptrauth_user_pac_mask()))
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#define __builtin_return_address(val)                                  \
>>>
>>> +       (void *)(ptrauth_clear_pac((unsigned 
>>> long)__builtin_return_address(val)))
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#endif /* __ASM_COMPILER_H */
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h 
>>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
>>>
>>> index 833d3f948de0..70c47156e54b 100644
>>>
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
>>>
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
>>>
>>> @@ -68,16 +68,9 @@ static __always_inline void 
>>> ptrauth_keys_switch_kernel(struct ptrauth_keys_kerne
>>>
>>>
>>>  extern int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long 
>>> arg);
>>>
>>>
>>> -/*
>>>
>>> - * The EL0 pointer bits used by a pointer authentication code.
>>>
>>> - * This is dependent on TBI0 being enabled, or bits 63:56 would also apply.
>>>
>>> - */
>>>
>>> -#define ptrauth_user_pac_mask()        GENMASK(54, vabits_actual)
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> -/* Only valid for EL0 TTBR0 instruction pointers */
>>>
>>>  static inline unsigned long ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(unsigned long ptr)
>>>
>>>  {
>>>
>>> -       return ptr & ~ptrauth_user_pac_mask();
>>>
>>> +       return ptrauth_clear_pac(ptr);
>>>
>>>  }
>>>
>>>
>>>  #define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: bevis_chen <bevis_c...@asus.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  arm64.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
>>>
>>> index b3040d7..c83a91a 100644
>>>
>>> --- a/arm64.c
>>>
>>> +++ b/arm64.c
>>>
>>> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static void arm64_get_crash_notes(void);
>>>
>>>  static void arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void);
>>>
>>>  static int arm64_is_uvaddr(ulong, struct task_context *);
>>>
>>>  static void arm64_calc_KERNELPACMASK(void);
>>>
>>> +static void arm64_recalc_KERNELPACMASK(void);
>>>
>>>  static int arm64_get_vmcoreinfo(unsigned long *vaddr, const char *label, 
>>> int base);
>>>
>>>
>>>  struct kernel_range {
>>>
>>> @@ -581,6 +582,16 @@ arm64_init(int when)
>>>
>>>                 if (!machdep->hz)
>>>
>>>                         machdep->hz = 100;
>>>
>>>
>>> +               /*
>>>
>>> +               * In the case of using ramdump rather than vmcore,
>>>
>>> +               * Will fail to parse out KERNELPAC.
>>>
>>> +               * So let's try again from kconfig to ensure if PAC enabled.
>>>
>>> +               * If yes, then we use vabits to figure it out.
>>>
>>> +               */
>>>
>>> +               if(!machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK)
>>>
>>> +                       arm64_recalc_KERNELPACMASK();
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>>                 arm64_irq_stack_init();
>>>
>>>                 arm64_overflow_stack_init();
>>>
>>>                 arm64_stackframe_init();
>>>
>>> @@ -4921,6 +4932,26 @@ static void arm64_calc_KERNELPACMASK(void)
>>>
>>>         }
>>>
>>>  }
>>>
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#define GENMASK_UL(h, l) \
>>>
>>> +    (((~0UL) << (l)) & (~0UL >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h))))
>>>
>>> +
>>
>>
>>
>> Think it again, the IKCONFIG is not available in most distributions, so it 
>> may not work well in such cases.
>>
>> Can we use some symbols to determine if the PTR AUTH mechanism is enabled? 
>> For example([1] or [2]):
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL
>>
>> struct ptrauth_keys_kernel {
>>         struct ptrauth_key apia;
>> };
>>
>> [1] check if the struct ptrauth_keys_kernel exists, eg:
>>
>> STRUCT_SIZE_INIT(ptrauth_keys_kernel, "ptrauth_keys_kernel");
>>
>> if (VALID_SIZE(ptrauth_keys_kernel) > 0) {
>
>I think
>
>if (VALID_SIZE(ptrauth_keys_kernel))
>
>is enough...
>
>>
>>                        if (machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL){
>>
>>                                machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK 
>> =
>>
>>                                        GENMASK_UL(63, 
>> machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);
>>
>> }
>
>I'm OK with this check, it looks reasonable and worth a try... Hi
>@cb126yx, could you please have a try on this modification, to see if
>it can work for you?
>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> static __always_inline void ptrauth_keys_init_kernel(struct 
>> ptrauth_keys_kernel *keys)
>> {
>>         if (system_supports_address_auth())
>>                 get_random_bytes(&keys->apia, sizeof(keys->apia));
>> }
>> ...
>>
>> [2] check if the kernel symbol exists, eg:
>> if (kernel_symbol_exists("ptrauth_keys_init_kernel")) {
>
>I guess this check will not work, since the ptrauth_keys_init_kernel
>is inlined, there might be no such symbol found in kernel. Please
>correct me if I'm wrong...
>
>Thanks,
>Tao Liu
>
>>                           if (machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL){
>>
>>                                machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK 
>> =
>>
>>                                        GENMASK_UL(63, 
>> machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);
>>
>> }
>>
>> What do you think? bevis_chen and Tao.  Or any thoughts?
>>
>> BTW: In addition, the CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL relies on the 
>> CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH, no need to check them simultaneously.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Lianbo
>>
>>> +static void arm64_recalc_KERNELPACMASK(void){
>>>
>>> +       if (kt->ikconfig_flags & IKCONFIG_AVAIL){
>>>
>>> +               /* arm64: check pac already enabled yet.*/
>>>
>>> +               if ((get_kernel_config("CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH", NULL) == 
>>> IKCONFIG_Y)
>>>
>>> +                       && 
>>> (get_kernel_config("CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL", NULL) == IKCONFIG_Y)){
>>>
>>> +                       if (machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL){
>>>
>>> +                               
>>> machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK =
>>>
>>> +                                       GENMASK_UL(63, 
>>> machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);
>>>
>>> +                               if (CRASHDEBUG(1))
>>>
>>> +                                       fprintf(fp, 
>>> "CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK: %lx\n",
>>>
>>> +                                               
>>> machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK);
>>>
>>> +                       }
>>>
>>> +               }
>>>
>>> +       }
>>>
>>> +}
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>>  #endif  /* ARM64 */
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> 2.27.0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 2024-07-15 11:33:13, "cb126yx" <cb12...@126.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Lianbo
>>>
>>>
>>> I have already added the origin commit information to patch log, as V3 
>>> below.
>>>
>>>
>>> About the macro __GENMASK and GENMASK_UL.
>>>
>>> Both the two macros achieve the same effect, but __GENMASK uses more 
>>> addition and subtraction operations and is usually called in an internal 
>>> kernel core bit operation function,.
>>>
>>> Whereas GENMASK_UL uses shift operations directly, which are more efficient 
>>> and been exposed to external users as api, so I indeed use the GENMASK_UL 
>>> on purpose.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you have any other suggestions, please feel free to tell me !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From 1da252fcba90af00a42328f2a5e2ec5058ff4f7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>
>>> From: bevis_chen <bevis_c...@asus.com>
>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:05:44 +0800
>>>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix bt command show wrong stacktrace on ramdump 
>>> source
>>>
>>>
>>> If we use crash to parse ramdump(Qcom phone device) rathen than vmcore.
>>>
>>> Start command should be like: crash vmlinux --kaslr=xxx 
>>> DDRCS0_0.BIN@0x0000000080000000,... --machdep vabits_actual=39
>>>
>>> Then We will see bt command show misleading backtrace information below:
>>>
>>>
>>> crash> bt 16930
>>>
>>> PID: 16930    TASK: ffffff89b3eada00  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "Firebase Backgr"
>>>
>>>  #0 [ffffffc034c437f0] __switch_to at ffffffe0036832d4
>>>
>>>  #1 [ffffffc034c43850] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 6be732e004cf05a0
>>>
>>>    #2 [ffffffc034c438b0] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 86c54c6004ceff80
>>>
>>>  #3 [ffffffc034c43950] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 55d6f96003a7b120
>>>
>>>  #4 [ffffffc034c439f0] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 9ccec46003a80a64
>>>
>>>  #5 [ffffffc034c43ac0] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 8cf41e6003a945c4
>>>
>>>  #6 [ffffffc034c43b10] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at a8f181e00372c818
>>>
>>>  #7 [ffffffc034c43b40] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 6dedde600372c0d0
>>>
>>>  #8 [ffffffc034c43b90] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 62cc07e00373d0ac
>>>
>>>  #9 [ffffffc034c43c00] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 72fb1de00373bedc
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>      PC: 00000073f5294840   LR: 00000070d8f39ba4   SP: 00000070d4afd5d0
>>>
>>>     X29: 00000070d4afd600  X28: b4000071efcda7f0  X27: 00000070d4afe000
>>>
>>>     X26: 0000000000000000  X25: 00000070d9616000  X24: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     X23: 0000000000000000  X22: 0000000000000000  X21: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     X20: b40000728fd27520  X19: b40000728fd27550  X18: 000000702daba000
>>>
>>>     X17: 00000073f5294820  X16: 00000070d940f9d8  X15: 00000000000000bf
>>>
>>>     X14: 0000000000000000  X13: 00000070d8ad2fac  X12: b40000718fce5040
>>>
>>>     X11: 0000000000000000  X10: 0000000000000070   X9: 0000000000000001
>>>
>>>      X8: 0000000000000062   X7: 0000000000000020   X6: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>      X5: 0000000000000000   X4: 0000000000000000   X3: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>      X2: 0000000000000002   X1: 0000000000000080   X0: b40000728fd27550
>>>
>>>     ORIG_X0: b40000728fd27550  SYSCALLNO: ffffffff  PSTATE: 40001000
>>>
>>>
>>> By checking the raw data below, will see the lr (fp+8) data show the 
>>> pointer which already been replaced by PAC prefix.
>>>
>>>
>>> crash> bt -f
>>>
>>> PID: 16930    TASK: ffffff89b3eada00  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "Firebase Backgr"
>>>
>>>  #0 [ffffffc034c437f0] __switch_to at ffffffe0036832d4
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c437f0: ffffffc034c43850 6be732e004cf05a4
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43800: ffffffe006186108 a0ed07e004cf09c4
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43810: ffffff8a1a340000 ffffff8a8d343c00
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43820: ffffff89b3eada00 ffffff8b780db540
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43830: ffffff89b3eada00 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43840: 0000000000000004 712b828118484a00
>>>
>>>  #1 [ffffffc034c43850] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 6be732e004cf05a0
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43850: ffffffc034c438b0 86c54c6004ceff84
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43860: 000000708070f000 ffffffc034c43938
>>>
>>>     ffffffc034c43870: ffffff88bd822878 ffffff89b3eada00
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> So we check the CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH and CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL to 
>>> double check if pac mechanism been enabled on this ramdump.
>>>
>>> Then we use vabits to figure it out.
>>>
>>> Fix then show the right backtrace below:
>>>
>>> crash> bt 16930
>>>
>>> PID: 16930    TASK: ffffff89b3eada00  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "Firebase Backgr"
>>>
>>>  #0 [ffffffc034c437f0] __switch_to at ffffffe0036832d4
>>>
>>>  #1 [ffffffc034c43850] __schedule at ffffffe004cf05a0
>>>
>>>  #2 [ffffffc034c438b0] preempt_schedule_common at ffffffe004ceff80
>>>
>>>  #3 [ffffffc034c43950] unmap_page_range at ffffffe003a7b120
>>>
>>>  #4 [ffffffc034c439f0] unmap_vmas at ffffffe003a80a64
>>>
>>>  #5 [ffffffc034c43ac0] exit_mmap at ffffffe003a945c4
>>>
>>>  #6 [ffffffc034c43b10] __mmput at ffffffe00372c818
>>>
>>>  #7 [ffffffc034c43b40] mmput at ffffffe00372c0d0
>>>
>>>  #8 [ffffffc034c43b90] exit_mm at ffffffe00373d0ac
>>>
>>>  #9 [ffffffc034c43c00] do_exit at ffffffe00373bedc
>>>
>>>      PC: 00000073f5294840   LR: 00000070d8f39ba4   SP: 00000070d4afd5d0
>>>
>>>     X29: 00000070d4afd600  X28: b4000071efcda7f0  X27: 00000070d4afe000
>>>
>>>     X26: 0000000000000000  X25: 00000070d9616000  X24: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     X23: 0000000000000000  X22: 0000000000000000  X21: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>     X20: b40000728fd27520  X19: b40000728fd27550  X18: 000000702daba000
>>>
>>>     X17: 00000073f5294820  X16: 00000070d940f9d8  X15: 00000000000000bf
>>>
>>>     X14: 0000000000000000  X13: 00000070d8ad2fac  X12: b40000718fce5040
>>>
>>>     X11: 0000000000000000  X10: 0000000000000070   X9: 0000000000000001
>>>
>>>      X8: 0000000000000062   X7: 0000000000000020   X6: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>      X5: 0000000000000000   X4: 0000000000000000   X3: 0000000000000000
>>>
>>>      X2: 0000000000000002   X1: 0000000000000080   X0: b40000728fd27550
>>>
>>>     ORIG_X0: b40000728fd27550  SYSCALLNO: ffffffff  PSTATE: 40001000
>>>
>>>
>>> Let's use GENMASK to replace the pac pointer to fix it.
>>>
>>> gki related commit as below:
>>>
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> Author: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kach...@arm.com>
>>>
>>> Date:   Fri Mar 13 14:34:58 2020 +0530
>>>
>>>
>>>     arm64: mask PAC bits of __builtin_return_address
>>>
>>>
>>>     Functions like vmap() record how much memory has been allocated by their
>>>
>>>     callers, and callers are identified using __builtin_return_address(). 
>>> Once
>>>
>>>     the kernel is using pointer-auth the return address will be signed. This
>>>
>>>     means it will not match any kernel symbol, and will vary between threads
>>>
>>>     even for the same caller.
>>>
>>>
>>>     The output of /proc/vmallocinfo in this case may look like,
>>>
>>>     0x(____ptrval____)-0x(____ptrval____)   20480 0x86e28000100e7c60 
>>> pages=4 vmalloc N0=4
>>>
>>>     0x(____ptrval____)-0x(____ptrval____)   20480 0x86e28000100e7c60 
>>> pages=4 vmalloc N0=4
>>>
>>>     0x(____ptrval____)-0x(____ptrval____)   20480 0xc5c78000100e7c60 
>>> pages=4 vmalloc N0=4
>>>
>>>
>>>     The above three 64bit values should be the same symbol name and not
>>>
>>>     different LR values.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Use the pre-processor to add logic to clear the PAC to
>>>
>>>     __builtin_return_address() callers. This patch adds a new file
>>>
>>>     asm/compiler.h and is transitively included via 
>>> include/compiler_types.h on
>>>
>>>     the compiler command line so it is guaranteed to be loaded and the 
>>> users of
>>>
>>>     this macro will not find a wrong version.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Helper macros ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask/ptrauth_clear_pac are created for
>>>
>>>     this purpose and added in this file. Existing macro 
>>> ptrauth_user_pac_mask
>>>
>>>     moved from asm/pointer_auth.h.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kach...@arm.com>
>>>
>>>     Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.mo...@arm.com>
>>>
>>>     Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>>
>>> index 87e2cbb76930..115ceea0293e 100644
>>>
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>>
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>>
>>> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ config ARM64
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE if SLUB
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE
>>>
>>> +       select HAVE_ARCH_COMPILER_H
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
>>>
>>>         select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h 
>>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
>>>
>>> new file mode 100644
>>>
>>> index 000000000000..eece20d2c55f
>>>
>>> --- /dev/null
>>>
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h
>>>
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>>>
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>>
>>> +#ifndef __ASM_COMPILER_H
>>>
>>> +#define __ASM_COMPILER_H
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH)
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +/*
>>>
>>> + * The EL0/EL1 pointer bits used by a pointer authentication code.
>>>
>>> + * This is dependent on TBI0/TBI1 being enabled, or bits 63:56 would also 
>>> apply.
>>>
>>> + */
>>>
>>> +#define ptrauth_user_pac_mask()                GENMASK_ULL(54, 
>>> vabits_actual)
>>>
>>> +#define ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask()      GENMASK_ULL(63, vabits_actual)
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +/* Valid for EL0 TTBR0 and EL1 TTBR1 instruction pointers */
>>>
>>> +#define ptrauth_clear_pac(ptr)                                         \
>>>
>>> +       ((ptr & BIT_ULL(55)) ? (ptr | ptrauth_kernel_pac_mask()) :      \
>>>
>>> +                              (ptr & ~ptrauth_user_pac_mask()))
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#define __builtin_return_address(val)                                  \
>>>
>>> +       (void *)(ptrauth_clear_pac((unsigned 
>>> long)__builtin_return_address(val)))
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#endif /* __ASM_COMPILER_H */
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h 
>>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
>>>
>>> index 833d3f948de0..70c47156e54b 100644
>>>
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
>>>
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pointer_auth.h
>>>
>>> @@ -68,16 +68,9 @@ static __always_inline void 
>>> ptrauth_keys_switch_kernel(struct ptrauth_keys_kerne
>>>
>>>
>>>  extern int ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long 
>>> arg);
>>>
>>>
>>> -/*
>>>
>>> - * The EL0 pointer bits used by a pointer authentication code.
>>>
>>> - * This is dependent on TBI0 being enabled, or bits 63:56 would also apply.
>>>
>>> - */
>>>
>>> -#define ptrauth_user_pac_mask()        GENMASK(54, vabits_actual)
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> -/* Only valid for EL0 TTBR0 instruction pointers */
>>>
>>>  static inline unsigned long ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(unsigned long ptr)
>>>
>>>  {
>>>
>>> -       return ptr & ~ptrauth_user_pac_mask();
>>>
>>> +       return ptrauth_clear_pac(ptr);
>>>
>>>  }
>>>
>>>
>>>  #define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: bevis_chen <bevis_c...@asus.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  arm64.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
>>>
>>> index b3040d7..d8ce98f 100644
>>>
>>> --- a/arm64.c
>>>
>>> +++ b/arm64.c
>>>
>>> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static void arm64_get_crash_notes(void);
>>>
>>>  static void arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void);
>>>
>>>  static int arm64_is_uvaddr(ulong, struct task_context *);
>>>
>>>  static void arm64_calc_KERNELPACMASK(void);
>>>
>>> +static void arm64_recalc_KERNELPACMASK(void);
>>>
>>>  static int arm64_get_vmcoreinfo(unsigned long *vaddr, const char *label, 
>>> int base);
>>>
>>>
>>>  struct kernel_range {
>>>
>>> @@ -581,6 +582,18 @@ arm64_init(int when)
>>>
>>>                 if (!machdep->hz)
>>>
>>>                         machdep->hz = 100;
>>>
>>>
>>> +               /*
>>>
>>> +               * In the case of using ramdump rather than vmcore,
>>>
>>> +               * Will fail to parse out KERNELPAC.
>>>
>>> +               * So let's try again from kconfig to ensure if PAC enabled.
>>>
>>> +               * If yes, then we use vabits to figure it out.
>>>
>>> +               * gki related commit url:
>>>
>>> +               * 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230412160134.306148-4-mark.rutl...@arm.com/
>>>
>>> +               */
>>>
>>> +               if(!machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK)
>>>
>>> +                       arm64_recalc_KERNELPACMASK();
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>>                 arm64_irq_stack_init();
>>>
>>>                 arm64_overflow_stack_init();
>>>
>>>                 arm64_stackframe_init();
>>>
>>> @@ -4921,6 +4934,26 @@ static void arm64_calc_KERNELPACMASK(void)
>>>
>>>         }
>>>
>>>  }
>>>
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +#define GENMASK_UL(h, l) \
>>>
>>> +    (((~0UL) << (l)) & (~0UL >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h))))
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>> +static void arm64_recalc_KERNELPACMASK(void){
>>>
>>> +       if (kt->ikconfig_flags & IKCONFIG_AVAIL){
>>>
>>> +               /* arm64: check pac already enabled yet.*/
>>>
>>> +               if ((get_kernel_config("CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH", NULL) == 
>>> IKCONFIG_Y)
>>>
>>> +                       && 
>>> (get_kernel_config("CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL", NULL) == IKCONFIG_Y)){
>>>
>>> +                       if (machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL){
>>>
>>> +                               
>>> machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK =
>>>
>>> +                                       GENMASK_UL(63, 
>>> machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);
>>>
>>> +                               if (CRASHDEBUG(1))
>>>
>>> +                                       fprintf(fp, 
>>> "CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK: %lx\n",
>>>
>>> +                                               
>>> machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK);
>>>
>>> +                       }
>>>
>>> +               }
>>>
>>> +       }
>>>
>>> +}
>>>
>>> +
>>>
>>>  #endif  /* ARM64 */
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> 2.27.0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 2024-07-12 16:08:54, "Lianbo Jiang" <liji...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> >Hi,  bevis_chen
>>> >
>>> >Thank you for the v2.
>>> >
>>> >On 7/11/24 6:42 AM, devel-requ...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io wrote:
>>> >> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:19:01 -0000
>>> >> From:cb12...@126.com
>>> >> Subject: [Crash-utility] Re: arm64: Fix bt command show wrong
>>> >> stacktrace on ramdump source
>>> >> To:devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
>>> >> Message-ID:<20240710141901.30295.7...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io>
>>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> >>
>>> >> >From dd6b187ac15a237cefe863c4e5b432cf13b9883a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> >> From: bevis_chen<bevis_c...@asus.com>
>>> >> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:05:44 +0800
>>> >> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix bt command show wrong stacktrace on ramdump
>>> >> source
>>> >>
>>> >> If we use crash to parse ramdump(Qcom phone device) rathen than vmcore.
>>> >> Start command should be like: crash vmlinux --kaslr=xxx
>>> >> DDRCS0_0.BIN@0x0000000080000000,... --machdep vabits_actual=39
>>> >> Then We will see bt command show misleading backtrace information below:
>>> >>
>>> >> crash> bt 16930
>>> >> PID: 16930    TASK: ffffff89b3eada00  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "Firebase
>>> >> Backgr"
>>> >>   #0 [ffffffc034c437f0] __switch_to at ffffffe0036832d4
>>> >>   #1 [ffffffc034c43850] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 6be732e004cf05a0
>>> >>   #2 [ffffffc034c438b0] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 86c54c6004ceff80
>>> >>   #3 [ffffffc034c43950] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 55d6f96003a7b120
>>> >>   #4 [ffffffc034c439f0] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 9ccec46003a80a64
>>> >>   #5 [ffffffc034c43ac0] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 8cf41e6003a945c4
>>> >>   #6 [ffffffc034c43b10] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at a8f181e00372c818
>>> >>   #7 [ffffffc034c43b40] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 6dedde600372c0d0
>>> >>   #8 [ffffffc034c43b90] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 62cc07e00373d0ac
>>> >>   #9 [ffffffc034c43c00] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 72fb1de00373bedc
>>> >> ...
>>> >>       PC: 00000073f5294840   LR: 00000070d8f39ba4   SP: 00000070d4afd5d0
>>> >>      X29: 00000070d4afd600  X28: b4000071efcda7f0  X27: 00000070d4afe000
>>> >>      X26: 0000000000000000  X25: 00000070d9616000  X24: 0000000000000000
>>> >>      X23: 0000000000000000  X22: 0000000000000000  X21: 0000000000000000
>>> >>      X20: b40000728fd27520  X19: b40000728fd27550  X18: 000000702daba000
>>> >>      X17: 00000073f5294820  X16: 00000070d940f9d8  X15: 00000000000000bf
>>> >>      X14: 0000000000000000  X13: 00000070d8ad2fac  X12: b40000718fce5040
>>> >>      X11: 0000000000000000  X10: 0000000000000070   X9: 0000000000000001
>>> >>       X8: 0000000000000062   X7: 0000000000000020   X6: 0000000000000000
>>> >>       X5: 0000000000000000   X4: 0000000000000000   X3: 0000000000000000
>>> >>       X2: 0000000000000002   X1: 0000000000000080   X0: b40000728fd27550
>>> >>      ORIG_X0: b40000728fd27550  SYSCALLNO: ffffffff  PSTATE: 40001000
>>> >>
>>> >> By checking the raw data below, will see the lr (fp+8) data show the
>>> >> pointer which already been replaced by PAC prefix.
>>> >>
>>> >> crash> bt -f
>>> >> PID: 16930    TASK: ffffff89b3eada00  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "Firebase
>>> >> Backgr"
>>> >>   #0 [ffffffc034c437f0] __switch_to at ffffffe0036832d4
>>> >>      ffffffc034c437f0: ffffffc034c43850 6be732e004cf05a4
>>> >>      ffffffc034c43800: ffffffe006186108 a0ed07e004cf09c4
>>> >>      ffffffc034c43810: ffffff8a1a340000 ffffff8a8d343c00
>>> >>      ffffffc034c43820: ffffff89b3eada00 ffffff8b780db540
>>> >>      ffffffc034c43830: ffffff89b3eada00 0000000000000000
>>> >>      ffffffc034c43840: 0000000000000004 712b828118484a00
>>> >>   #1 [ffffffc034c43850] __kvm_nvhe_$d.2314 at 6be732e004cf05a0
>>> >>      ffffffc034c43850: ffffffc034c438b0 86c54c6004ceff84
>>> >>      ffffffc034c43860: 000000708070f000 ffffffc034c43938
>>> >>      ffffffc034c43870: ffffff88bd822878 ffffff89b3eada00
>>> >> ...
>>> >>
>>> >> So we check the CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH and CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL
>>> >> to double check if pac mechanism been enabled on this ramdump.
>>> >> Then we use vabits to figure it out.
>>> >> Fix then show the right backtrace below:
>>> >> crash> bt 16930
>>> >> PID: 16930    TASK: ffffff89b3eada00  CPU: 2    COMMAND: "Firebase
>>> >> Backgr"
>>> >>   #0 [ffffffc034c437f0] __switch_to at ffffffe0036832d4
>>> >>   #1 [ffffffc034c43850] __schedule at ffffffe004cf05a0
>>> >>   #2 [ffffffc034c438b0] preempt_schedule_common at ffffffe004ceff80
>>> >>   #3 [ffffffc034c43950] unmap_page_range at ffffffe003a7b120
>>> >>   #4 [ffffffc034c439f0] unmap_vmas at ffffffe003a80a64
>>> >>   #5 [ffffffc034c43ac0] exit_mmap at ffffffe003a945c4
>>> >>   #6 [ffffffc034c43b10] __mmput at ffffffe00372c818
>>> >>   #7 [ffffffc034c43b40] mmput at ffffffe00372c0d0
>>> >>   #8 [ffffffc034c43b90] exit_mm at ffffffe00373d0ac
>>> >>   #9 [ffffffc034c43c00] do_exit at ffffffe00373bedc
>>> >>       PC: 00000073f5294840   LR: 00000070d8f39ba4   SP: 00000070d4afd5d0
>>> >>      X29: 00000070d4afd600  X28: b4000071efcda7f0  X27: 00000070d4afe000
>>> >>      X26: 0000000000000000  X25: 00000070d9616000  X24: 0000000000000000
>>> >>      X23: 0000000000000000  X22: 0000000000000000  X21: 0000000000000000
>>> >>      X20: b40000728fd27520  X19: b40000728fd27550  X18: 000000702daba000
>>> >>      X17: 00000073f5294820  X16: 00000070d940f9d8  X15: 00000000000000bf
>>> >>      X14: 0000000000000000  X13: 00000070d8ad2fac  X12: b40000718fce5040
>>> >>      X11: 0000000000000000  X10: 0000000000000070   X9: 0000000000000001
>>> >>       X8: 0000000000000062   X7: 0000000000000020   X6: 0000000000000000
>>> >>       X5: 0000000000000000   X4: 0000000000000000   X3: 0000000000000000
>>> >>       X2: 0000000000000002   X1: 0000000000000080   X0: b40000728fd27550
>>> >>      ORIG_X0: b40000728fd27550  SYSCALLNO: ffffffff  PSTATE: 40001000
>>> >>
>>> >> Let's use GENMASK to replace the pac pointer to fix it.
>>> >> gki related commit url here:
>>> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230412160134.306148-4-mark.rutl...@arm.com/
>>> >
>>> >Can you help to add the kernel commit to patch log?
>>> >
>>> >de1702f65feb ("arm64: move PAC masks to <asm/pointer_auth.h>")
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> Signed-off-by: bevis_chen<bevis_c...@asus.com>
>>> >> ---
>>> >>   arm64.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> >>   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>> >>
>>> >> diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
>>> >> index b3040d7..d8ce98f 100644
>>> >> --- a/arm64.c
>>> >> +++ b/arm64.c
>>> >> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static void arm64_get_crash_notes(void);
>>> >>   static void arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void);
>>> >>   static int arm64_is_uvaddr(ulong, struct task_context *);
>>> >>   static void arm64_calc_KERNELPACMASK(void);
>>> >> +static void arm64_recalc_KERNELPACMASK(void);
>>> >>   static int arm64_get_vmcoreinfo(unsigned long *vaddr, const char 
>>> >> *label, int base);
>>> >>
>>> >>   struct kernel_range {
>>> >> @@ -581,6 +582,18 @@ arm64_init(int when)
>>> >>                  if (!machdep->hz)
>>> >>                          machdep->hz = 100;
>>> >>
>>> >> +               /*
>>> >> +               * In the case of using ramdump rather than vmcore,
>>> >> +               * Will fail to parse out KERNELPAC.
>>> >> +               * So let's try again from kconfig to ensure if PAC 
>>> >> enabled.
>>> >> +               * If yes, then we use vabits to figure it out.
>>> >> +               * gki related commit url:
>>> >> +               
>>> >> *https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230412160134.306148-4-mark.rutl...@arm.com/
>>> >> +               */
>>> >> +               if(!machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK)
>>> >> +                       arm64_recalc_KERNELPACMASK();
>>> >> +
>>> >> +
>>> >>                  arm64_irq_stack_init();
>>> >>                  arm64_overflow_stack_init();
>>> >>                  arm64_stackframe_init();
>>> >> @@ -4921,6 +4934,26 @@ static void arm64_calc_KERNELPACMASK(void)
>>> >>          }
>>> >>   }
>>> >>
>>> >> +
>>> >> +#define GENMASK_UL(h, l) \
>>> >> +    (((~0UL) << (l)) & (~0UL >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h))))
>>> >> +
>>> >
>>> >BTW: I saw a similar version implemented in the kernel, can you help
>>> >double check if that is intentional?
>>> >
>>> >#define __GENMASK(h, l) \
>>> >         (((~_UL(0)) - (_UL(1) << (l)) + 1) & \
>>> >          (~_UL(0) >> (__BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h))))
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Thanks
>>> >
>>> >Lianbo
>>> >
>>> >> +static void arm64_recalc_KERNELPACMASK(void){
>>> >> +       if (kt->ikconfig_flags & IKCONFIG_AVAIL){
>>> >> +               /* arm64: check pac already enabled yet.*/
>>> >> +               if ((get_kernel_config("CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH", NULL) == 
>>> >> IKCONFIG_Y)
>>> >> +                       && 
>>> >> (get_kernel_config("CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL", NULL) == IKCONFIG_Y)){
>>> >> +                       if (machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL){
>>> >> +                               
>>> >> machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK =
>>> >> +                                       GENMASK_UL(63, 
>>> >> machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);
>>> >> +                               if (CRASHDEBUG(1))
>>> >> +                                       fprintf(fp, 
>>> >> "CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK: %lx\n",
>>> >> +                                               
>>> >> machdep->machspec->CONFIG_ARM64_KERNELPACMASK);
>>> >> +                       }
>>> >> +               }
>>> >> +       }
>>> >> +}
>>> >> +
>>> >>   #endif  /* ARM64 */
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> 2.27.0
>>> >--
>>> >Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
>>> >To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
>>> >https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
>>> >Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki

Reply via email to