Hello Lianbo,
2024년 11월 6일 (수) 오후 12:53, lijiang <[email protected]>님이 작성:
>
> Hi, Austin
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 5:19 PM <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:32:07 +0900
>> From: Austin Kim <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [Crash-utility] [PATCH] RISCV64: add panic signature to
>> panic_msg to properly display the PANIC message
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
>> Message-ID: <20241029083207.GA30130@adminpc-PowerEdge-R7525>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>> Using 'sys' command, we can view the panic message with general system
>> information. If we run RISCV64-based vmcore, PANIC message is not properly
>> displayed.
>>
>> The reason is that "Unable to handle kernel" is first printed in the kernel
>> log
>> when exception occurs in the RISC-V based Linux kernel. The corresponding
>> kernel commit is 21733cb518471.
>>
>> Without the patch:
>> crash> sys
>> KERNEL: vmlinux [TAINTED]
>> DUMPFILE: vmcore
>> CPUS: 4
>> DATE: Thu Aug 22 16:13:08 KST 2024
>> UPTIME: 00:33:25
>> LOAD AVERAGE: 0.07, 0.07, 0.02
>> TASKS: 385
>> NODENAME: starfive
>> RELEASE: 6.6.20+
>> VERSION: #13 SMP Mon Aug 19 12:58:52 KST 2024
>> MACHINE: riscv64 (unknown Mhz)
>> MEMORY: 4 GB
>> PANIC: ""
>>
>> With the patch:
>> crash> sys
>> KERNEL: vmlinux [TAINTED]
>> DUMPFILE: vmcore
>> CPUS: 4
>> DATE: Thu Aug 22 16:13:08 KST 2024
>> UPTIME: 00:33:25
>> LOAD AVERAGE: 0.07, 0.07, 0.02
>> TASKS: 385
>> NODENAME: starfive
>> RELEASE: 6.6.20+
>> VERSION: #13 SMP Mon Aug 19 12:58:52 KST 2024
>> MACHINE: riscv64 (unknown Mhz)
>> MEMORY: 4 GB
>> PANIC: "Unable to handle kernel access to user memory without uaccess
>> routines at virtual address 0000000000000000"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> task.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/task.c b/task.c
>> index d52ce0b..443f488 100644
>> --- a/task.c
>> +++ b/task.c
>> @@ -6330,6 +6330,7 @@ static const char* panic_msg[] = {
>> "[Hardware Error]: ",
>> "Bad mode in ",
>> "Oops: ",
>> + "Unable to handle kernel access ",
>
>
> I would tend to search the panic keywords again as below, which can cover
> both riscv64 and aarch64 cases.
>
> diff --git a/task.c b/task.c
> index c131cc32067d..9613adebab57 100644
> --- a/task.c
> +++ b/task.c
> @@ -6392,6 +6392,9 @@ get_panicmsg(char *buf)
> get_symbol_data("sysrq_pressed", sizeof(int),
> &msg_found);
> break;
> }
> +
> + /* try to search panic string with panic keywords*/
> + search_panic_task_by_keywords(buf, &msg_found);
> }
>
> found:
>
>
> What do you think? I haven't tested this one, not sure if it can work for
> you, could you please try it?
Thank you for the positive feedback on the patch and for sharing
another great idea.
I tested the patch you suggested, and it worked well on my side.
Here’s the crash message:
crash> sys | grep PANIC
PANIC: "Unable to handle kernel access to user memory without
uaccess routines at virtual address 0000000000000000"
This new patch is useful not only for RISC-V but also for a wider
range of architectures,
and it seems like a better approach than modifying panic_msg[].
Best regards,
Austin Kim
> Tao, can we also do a regression test to double check if there are any risks?
>
> Thanks
> Lianbo
>
>
>>
>> };
>>
>> #define ARRAY_SIZE(a) (sizeof (a) / sizeof ((a)[0]))
>> --
>> 2.17.1
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki