On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:52 AM <devel-requ...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io>
wrote:

> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 15:59:20 +1300
> From: Tao Liu <l...@redhat.com>
> Subject: [Crash-utility] Re: [PATCH] Fix misleading CPU count in
>         display_sys_stats()
> To: soak...@redhat.com
> Cc: devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
> Message-ID:
>         <
> cao7dbbxo5q4ad049r4qtj14hoi97xy_13-nja-1vmuwggge...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Thanks for the fix, LGTM, so ack.
>

Applied(with slight changes):
https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/88453095a3dd54b0950f7d9011fb32b47aaaa0c7

Thanks
Lianbo


>
> Thanks,
> Tao Liu
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 10:54 AM <soak...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Lucas Oakley <soak...@redhat.com>
> >
> > This simplication fixes the total CPU count being reported
> > incorrectly in ppc64le and s390x systems when some number of
> > CPUs have been offlined, as the kt->cpus value is adjusted.
> > This adds the word "OFFLINE" to the 'sys' output for s390x
> > and ppc64le, like exists for x86_64 and aarch64 when examining
> > systems with offlined CPUs.
> >
> > Without patch:
> >
> >   KERNEL: /debug/4.18.0-477.10.1.el8_8.s390x/vmlinux
> > DUMPFILE: /proc/kcore
> >     CPUS: 1
> >
> > With patch:
> >
> >   KERNEL: /debug/4.18.0-477.10.1.el8_8.s390x/vmlinux
> > DUMPFILE: /proc/kcore
> >     CPUS: 2 [OFFLINE: 1]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Oakley <soak...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel.c | 16 +++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel.c b/kernel.c
> > index 8c2e0ca..3e190f1 100644
> > --- a/kernel.c
> > +++ b/kernel.c
> > @@ -5816,15 +5816,13 @@ display_sys_stats(void)
> >                                 pc->kvmdump_mapfile);
> >         }
> >
> > -       if (machine_type("PPC64"))
> > -               fprintf(fp, "        CPUS: %d\n", get_cpus_to_display());
> > -       else {
> > -               fprintf(fp, "        CPUS: %d", kt->cpus);
> > -               if (kt->cpus - get_cpus_to_display())
> > -                       fprintf(fp, " [OFFLINE: %d]",
> > -                               kt->cpus - get_cpus_to_display());
> > -               fprintf(fp, "\n");
> > -       }
> > +        int number_cpus_to_display = get_cpus_to_display();
> > +        int number_cpus_present = get_cpus_present();
> > +        fprintf(fp, "        CPUS: %d", number_cpus_present);
> > +        if (number_cpus_present != number_cpus_to_display)
> > +                fprintf(fp, " [OFFLINE: %d]",
> > +                    number_cpus_present - number_cpus_to_display);
> > +        fprintf(fp, "\n");
> >
> >         if (ACTIVE())
> >                 get_xtime(&kt->date);
> > --
> > 2.47.1
>
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki

Reply via email to