On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:18 PM Tao Liu <l...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 12:30 PM Stephen Brennan
> <stephen.s.bren...@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tao,
> >
> > Thanks for digging through the code with me. I'm not very confident or
> > familiar with it, so I don't have 100% confident answers, but I'll do my
> > best to answer:
>
> Thanks for your explanation! I think your modification is reasonable
> and I have run tests against your patch, no regression is found.
> Though I still haven't figured out whether it is a gdb issue or crash
> specific, however I think it is OK to accept your patch for now. So I
> will ack your No.1 and No.2 patch. Though No.2 patch needs some
> cleanup on the code, but I think that is just a minor change, I have
> no objection to its major part.
>
> So ack.
>

 Applied:
[1]
https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/2cf1a93805a8df6a2a4b7fde8d57b6d873c1bbeb
[2]
https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/b982ddc4d66dcd59e567201428eb6191e4a24695

BTW: regenerated the patch for [2].

Thanks
Lianbo


> Thanks,
> Tao Liu
>
>
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.crash-utility.osci.io
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki

Reply via email to