On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 01:26:40PM +0200, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
Could you please clarify why these are not two separate commits?
> - Update s390x_vr_IS_VMALLOC_ADDR() to include a non-zero vmalloc_start
> check, making it consistent with s390x_generic_IS_VMALLOC_ADDR().
This one looks as a bug fix to me.
> - Remove redundant vmalloc_start check from s390x_kvtop().
And this one is a follow-up optimization, unless there was
a reason for this check before commit d0164e7 ("s390x: uncouple
physical and virtual memory spaces"). Do you have any ideas?
> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <[email protected]>
> ---
> s390x.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
Thanks!
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
